Sermon Tone Analysis

Overall tone of the sermon

This automated analysis scores the text on the likely presence of emotional, language, and social tones. There are no right or wrong scores; this is just an indication of tones readers or listeners may pick up from the text.
A score of 0.5 or higher indicates the tone is likely present.
Emotion Tone
Anger
0.48UNLIKELY
Disgust
0.09UNLIKELY
Fear
0.09UNLIKELY
Joy
0.56LIKELY
Sadness
0.2UNLIKELY
Language Tone
Analytical
0.47UNLIKELY
Confident
0UNLIKELY
Tentative
0.25UNLIKELY
Social Tone
Openness
0.9LIKELY
Conscientiousness
0.69LIKELY
Extraversion
0.18UNLIKELY
Agreeableness
0.34UNLIKELY
Emotional Range
0.69LIKELY

Tone of specific sentences

Tones
Emotion
Anger
Disgust
Fear
Joy
Sadness
Language
Analytical
Confident
Tentative
Social Tendencies
Openness
Conscientiousness
Extraversion
Agreeableness
Emotional Range
Anger
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9
Cosmic Geography
Last week we looked at YHWH’s disinheritance of the nations.
This was the theological lens through which an ancient Israelite viewed her own nation with respect to all others, and her elohim YHWH, against the gods of the nations.
By definition YHWH was superior he was Most High… the title used in Deut 32: 8-9 ..
The Old Testament therefore describes a world were cosmic-geographical lines have been drawn.
Israel was on Holy Ground because it was YHWH’s inheritance in the language of Deut 32.
The territory of other nations belonged to other elohim because God had decreed it.
The Psalm we focused on to start this study (Psalm 82) tells us the lesser elohim are corrupt, we have no information as to how they became that way -only that they are.
It is also clear throughout the text that these being were illegitimate for Israelite worship.
This idea of cosmic geography clarifies several odd passages of the Bible, and provides dramatic theological backdrop to others.
Some of the most startling are in the New Testament and I’ll hold back on those until we get to them.
Just remember the paradigm presented here.
Today we will get some short and fascinating examples.
David’s Problem
After his anointing by Samuel and victory over Goliath (1 Sam 16-18) David spends a great deal of time trying to get away from the blind rage of King Saul.
During the time he is on the run, David must occasionally flee into territory outside the borders of Israel.
In one of these episodes David finds Saul in a vulnerable situation and they have this conversation:
Translated as heritage of the Lord here it is the same language “no share in the inheritance of YHWH” as in Deut 32, and Deut 4. Is David ignorant of the fact that the God who made heaven and earth can be anywhere?
No.
In David’s mind, being driven outside Isreal meant not being able to worship YHWH.
Note that he does not complain of being driven from the Ark of the Covenant, located at Kiriath Jearim (1 Sam 7:2), or from the Tabernacle, apparently located at Nob (1 Sam 21-22).
His complaint is being expelled from the “inheritance” or “heritage” of the Lord — the holy land of his God.
David can’t worship as he should if he is not on holy ground.
The lands outside Isreal belong to other gods.
Naaman Asks for Dirt
Another fascinating story that illustrates the Israelite cosmic-geographical worldview is the story of Naaman, the commander of the army of Syria, a foreign country just beyond Israel's northern border.
Naaman also happened to afflicted with leprosy.
According to 2 Kings 5, at the suggestion of a captive Israelite servant girl, Naaman decides to seek the prophet Elisha for a cure for his condition.
He travels to Isreal, but Elisha doesn’t even come out to talk to him in person.
He sends a messenger to tell the military hero to wash himself in the Jordan seven times if he want to be healed.
Insulted, Naaman at first resists, then relents at the encouragement of his servants.
He does as instructed and emerges cleansed from the skin disease.
Naaman returned to the prophet, who this time chose to speak with the Syrian.
Picking up the story:
2 Kings 5:15–19 (ESV)
Then he returned to the man of God, he and all his company, and he came and stood before him.
And he said, “Behold, I know that there is no God in all the earth but in Israel; so accept now a present from your servant.”
But he said, “As the Lord lives, before whom I stand, I will receive none.”
And he urged him to take it, but he refused.
Then Naaman said, “If not, please let there be given to your servant two mule loads of earth, for from now on your servant will not offer burnt offering or sacrifice to any god but the Lord.
In this matter may the Lord pardon your servant: when my master goes into the house of Rimmon to worship there, leaning on my arm, and I bow myself in the house of Rimmon, when I bow myself in the house of Rimmon, the Lord pardon your servant in this matter.”
He said to him, “Go in peace.”
The brief trip into Isreal and the encounter with YHWH’s prophet have taught Naaman some good theology.
He affirms that 2 Kings 5:15
From henceforth he will sacrifice only to YHWH.
But how can he keep that vow after returning to Syria?
Simple — he pleads for dirt to take home.
Naama views the land of Isreal as holy ground — it is YHWH’s territory.
Naaman takes as much dirt as his mules can carry so he can worship YHWH on YHWHs own territory, even thought Naama lives in the domain of the god Rimmon.
We aren’t told if Naaman went home and spread dirt on the floor of a room in his home.
We don’t know how he handled his duty to accompany his aged king into Rimmon’s temple.
Perhaps he carried dirt with him as a pledge of his believing loyalty to YHWH.
What we do know is that the dirt was a theological statement.
Dirt from Israel was the means by which Naaman showed his faith and kept his vow to the true Most High God.
Daniel and Paul
Another passage in the Old Testament, Daniel 10, presumes the Deuteronomy 32 worldview.
In Daniel 10 we read about a vision of the prophet.
Daniel sees a “man” dressed in linen, whom he describes this way: Daniel 10:6
we’ve discussed that shininess or brilliant luminescence is a stock description for a divine being.
The radiant figure, who is never identified in the passage, says to Daniel: Daniel 10:12-14
the figure later adds, before ending the conversation: Daniel 10: 20-21
This is one of the odd sections of scripture where there in unanimous agreement that the “princes” referred to in Daniel 10 are divine beings, not humans.
This is transparent from the mention of Micheal in the readings, who is called “prince.”
This is a concept based on Deut 32: 8-9 ..
This passage, along with Deut 32 is the foundation for Paul’s theology of the unseen world.
This is made clear in Acts 17: 26-27
Acts 17:26–27 (ESV)
And he made from one man every nation of mankind to live on all the face of the earth, having determined allotted periods and the boundaries of their dwelling place, that they should seek God, and perhaps feel their way toward him and find him.
Yet he is actually not far from each one of us,
Paul alludes to the allotted boundaries of Deut 32 and the nations produced by God’s judgment at Babel, God has disinherited the nations as his people and made a new people from himself, Isreal his own “portion.”
Immediately after Babel God will call Abram for that purpose, beginning a covenant relationship with Abraham and his yet unborn descendents.
That covenant relationship included the idea that Paul refers to in Acts 17: 27 the drawing of the disinherited Gentile nations.
Paul’s rationale for his own ministry to the Gentiles was that it was God’s intention to reclaim the nations to restore the original Edenic vision.
Every person in every nation was given the opportunity to repent and believe in the Risen Christ.
Salvation was not only for the physical children of Abraham, but for anyone who would believe.
More pointedly, Paul’s terminology for the powers of darkness reflects the cosmic geographical worldview from Deut 32: 8-9 .. The Hebrew word for “prince” used in Daniel 10 is sar.
In Daniel 10: 13 , where Michael is called “one of the chief princes,” The Septuagint refers to Michael as one of the chief archonton.
(rulers) In other Greek translations of Daniel, a text many consider even older that the Septuagint, the prince of Persia and Israel’s prince, Michael, are both described with the Greek word archon.
These are the terms of territorial rule are used by Paul
1 Corinthians 2:6 (ESV)
Yet among the mature we do impart wisdom, although it is not a wisdom of this age or of the rulers of this age, who are doomed to pass away.
1 Corinthians 2:8 (ESV)
None of the rulers of this age understood this, for if they had, they would not have crucified the Lord of glory.
Ephesians 3:10 (ESV)
so that through the church the manifold wisdom of God might now be made known to the rulers and authorities in the heavenly places.
Ephesians 2:2 (ESV)
in which you once walked, following the course of this world, following the prince of the power of the air, the spirit that is now at work in the sons of disobedience—
Paul uses several terms that he interchanges that are familiar to most who read the Bible studiously.
principalities (arche)
powers/authorities (exousia)
powers (dynamis)
dominions/lords (kyrios)
Thrones (thronos)
Geographical domain rulership
These titles imply domain, geography, territory…
the first three are here Eph 6: 12
And Paul writes in Eph 1: 20-21
and then Colossian says Col 2:15
The rulers and authorities are disarmed and put to shame by the cross
The incident at Babel and God’s decision to disinherit the nations drew up the battle lines for a cosmic turf war for the planet.The corruption of the sons of God (watchers) set over the nations meant that YHWH vision of a global Eden would be met with supernatural for.
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9