Sermon Tone Analysis

Overall tone of the sermon

This automated analysis scores the text on the likely presence of emotional, language, and social tones. There are no right or wrong scores; this is just an indication of tones readers or listeners may pick up from the text.
A score of 0.5 or higher indicates the tone is likely present.
Emotion Tone
Anger
0.44UNLIKELY
Disgust
0.5LIKELY
Fear
0.1UNLIKELY
Joy
0.55LIKELY
Sadness
0.53LIKELY
Language Tone
Analytical
0.54LIKELY
Confident
0UNLIKELY
Tentative
0.31UNLIKELY
Social Tone
Openness
0.81LIKELY
Conscientiousness
0.54LIKELY
Extraversion
0.2UNLIKELY
Agreeableness
0.6LIKELY
Emotional Range
0.61LIKELY

Tone of specific sentences

Tones
Emotion
Anger
Disgust
Fear
Joy
Sadness
Language
Analytical
Confident
Tentative
Social Tendencies
Openness
Conscientiousness
Extraversion
Agreeableness
Emotional Range
Anger
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9
Business is Business?
Nov.1, 1998               Genesis 29-31
 
*Introduction:*
 
*Ps 18:25  To the faithful you show yourself faithful, to the blameless you show yourself blameless,*
*Ps 18:26  to the pure you show yourself pure, but to the crooked you show yourself shrewd.*
“Shrewd” is used here in a good sense as God’s wisdom.
God is forthright with the honest person, but the deceptive cannot outwit Him.
 
*Mt 10:16 ¶ I am sending you out like sheep among wolves.
Therefore be as shrewd as snakes and as innocent as doves.*
And we are allowed to be shrewd in our defense against evil, but not in committing it.
*Lu 16:8  "The master commended the dishonest manager because he had acted shrewdly.
For the people of this world are more shrewd in dealing with their own kind than are the people of the light.*
Jesus here assumes that worldly people will be shrewd about their own interests, but this is not to be so with God’s people who trust their interests to Him.
I got a call at church the other day from a man who acted real friendly like he was very familiar with us and wanted to do us a favor.
He gave me his name, presumably, and said he was from Xerox.
He verified if in fact we were among those on their records who owned a copier model 5114, saying that last time their representative was there he noticed we only had two toner cartridges on hand.
He went on to say that Xerox was presently experiencing a severe shortage of materials for these cartridges and they would like to send some our way just to make sure we were kept in supply.
As soon as I started to say that, “I am sorry but I don’t recall any such arrangement whereby we were supplied by any company directly,” the phone immediately hung up.
What the man was doing was hoping he got someone on the line who didn’t know any better and would buy into his line that they were on retainer by us to keep us in stock on copier supplies - probably at a much inflated price.
He was adept at this, but he did not want to respond to anyone who knew what they were talking about.
Its like going to buy a used car and the salesman assures you that they have the best used cars around.
You won’t find anything wrong with their cars.
But as soon as you buy one and drive it a few days, find out all that was just waiting for you to happen, and go back to the dealer with questions, he says, “What did you expect out of a used car, perfection?”  Dishonesty in business abounds.
*1.*
Note the business mind of Laban in *vs.
15*, always thinking, the wheels are turning, what can he turn to his advantage?
Jacob has already tipped his hand that he is star-struck with Rachel.
He stays on in good faith, to show good faith, for a month, probably hoping to prove himself and find a way, trusting God, to marry Rachel.
It is Laban that sees opportunity for worldly profit and turns their relationship from that of relatives in good faith as uncle-nephew to that of employer-employee or boss and hireling, giving Laban the upper hand in the relationship.
I believe that Laban already has a plan here.
Jacob wants something and Laban knows what it is.
Laban’s question about wages sucks him in as if he is doing him a favor.
It isn’t for wages that Jacob will work but for something much more valuable, the love of his life, from which Laban will take advantage.
Jacob names his wages not just as he is told, but as he is coerced to do.
He places such a high value on Rachel that he is willing to work for her for seven years.
How many of us would work that long for our spouses?
I know, most of us would work even longer, and already have.
But Jacob shows an honest heart here.
Jacob may have deceived his brother, Esau, out of the birthright.
But I believe he was changed by the appearance God made to him in his dream as he was sent by his parents on his way to find Laban.
The result of that dream, Jacob’s Ladder, was that God made a covenant with Jacob and Jacob took faith in God personally unto himself.
He was now walking in faith with God and had no need to try and deceive Laban, even though that would be his experience from Laban over the next twenty years.
You could say that this was payback time for his deceit of his brother as he learns firsthand of its pain, but that does not absolve Laban.
This message is about the duplicitous, deceptive, manipulative, ungodly nature of man that takes advantage even of those closest to him for whom he should have the greatest interest of welfare.
But this message is also about our God who does treat us honestly in perfect relationship even while others whom we should be able to trust do not.
God is able to multiply our sorrows with blessings, but it is in his way and time as our faith is developed, nurtured, and matured.
Ultimately, God will take from those who have received ill gain and give to those who have gained ill.  God’s economy will float while all else will crash.
*2.*
In *vs.
16* we see the problem emerging of the older daughter, Leah.
The usual explanation of her implies that she is ugly because she has “weak” eyes.
But that may not be the precise meaning.
It more likely means that her eyes are tender, gentle, soft, and delicate, but other than that she is not strikingly beautiful like Rachel.
Jacob makes it plain that he is working for Rachel, but Laban allows him to think it without affirming it in *vs.
19* because he does not say her name.
Jacob is so love-struck that he doesn’t catch it.
There is the other daughter that Laban can use to double his profit.
Isn’t it amazing how well we can lie, and justify it in out own minds by playing games of words and definitions?
(Like, what is a definition of sex?)  Must we be so air-tight in our dealings to cover ourselves from what should be obvious as it is here by what Jacob understood?
         
*3.*
Jacob has now served the seven years in *vs.
21* and asks for his wife.
He was so in love that those seven years flew by.
He so much understands his impending marriage to be with Rachel that now he does not even say her name.
He already refers to her as “my wife.”
He demands what he understands to be his.
Laban does not answer but puts together the wedding and carries out his plan of the last seven years.
He does his deed of darkness and slips older sister Leah under the veil and under the bed sheets as well.
Now there is a lesson here to us guys.
And that is that looks aren’t everything.
Jacob is none the wiser until he lifts the visor.
Leah ran good in the garage but didn’t fit Jacob’s race car image when the light streaked through the garage door in the morning.
Sometimes those vintage models are more reliable that the newer ones.
But Jacob still had his mind on the shiny new sports car.
It is interesting to note here that as time goes on, Jacob tallies up 13 children from Leah, Rachel, and their two maid-servants.
All but one were sons who spawned the 12 tribes of Israel.
Rachel ends up dying in childbirth after Benjamin, her second, was born.
It is Leah who produces 7 children, 6 sons and 1 daughter.
That is a lot of mileage.
This was all a part of God’s sovereignty to produce the covenant nation that he promised to Abraham, Isaac and Jacob.
Even though Laban intended deception, God intended good.
*4.*
Jacob calls Laban to account in *vs.
25*.
Laban brings up a concern that he never mentioned before, namely that it is custom to marry the older off before the younger.
Whether this was true or not true, it was deceptive, and the marriage cannot be annulled once it is consummated.
A deal is struck whereby Laban now offers Rachel to Jacob for another 7 years labor, but he offers her on credit.
Jacob’s character will make good on it.
Jacob can have her now and pay as he goes.
This appeases him since he is so in love with Rachel.
But Laban now has what he wanted which was Jacob over the barrel of another 7 years.
And Jacob did indeed love Rachel more than Leah, to which God blessed Leah with the fruit of the womb in recompense while Rachel was barren as it says in *vs.
31*.
Men, here is another lesson that we must love the wife that God gives us because he loves her.
 
*5.*
Now there are a lot of truths we could learn from these passages, but we will confine ourselves to the relationship between Jacob and Laban for the purpose of our intent.
Skip to *30:25* where presumably 14 years have now passed and Jacob wants to take his leave from Laban.
Laban has grown used to the financial blessings that Jacob has brought him and pleads for a continuation by once again asking Jacob to name his wages in *vs.
28*.
Indeed, this was a part of God’s covenant with Jacob, that he would be a blessing (Gen.
28:13-15).
And Laban recognizes that it is God who has blessed him through Jacob, *vs.
27*.
So from here on out, Laban knowingly seeks to take advantage not just of Jacob, but of God as he continues to attempt deception.
Jacob knows his own value because he knows the value of the God who is with him, *vs.
30*,  and so he asks not for wages but for the least valued, irregular, and abnormal animals in Laban’s herd, *vs.
32*, casting his lot with God who is able to give the increase.
The Mediterranean sheep are normally white and the goats black.
Jacob specifies all the rest, perhaps 20%, shall be his and goes so far to say that if anything /but/ an off-colored lamb or goat is found in his possession, it should be considered stolen.
This says something about his knowledge of his father-in-law.
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9