Sermon Tone Analysis

Overall tone of the sermon

This automated analysis scores the text on the likely presence of emotional, language, and social tones. There are no right or wrong scores; this is just an indication of tones readers or listeners may pick up from the text.
A score of 0.5 or higher indicates the tone is likely present.
Emotion Tone
Anger
0.5LIKELY
Disgust
0.09UNLIKELY
Fear
0.14UNLIKELY
Joy
0.48UNLIKELY
Sadness
0.58LIKELY
Language Tone
Analytical
0.55LIKELY
Confident
0UNLIKELY
Tentative
0.01UNLIKELY
Social Tone
Openness
0.86LIKELY
Conscientiousness
0.74LIKELY
Extraversion
0.03UNLIKELY
Agreeableness
0.44UNLIKELY
Emotional Range
0.7LIKELY

Tone of specific sentences

Tones
Emotion
Anger
Disgust
Fear
Joy
Sadness
Language
Analytical
Confident
Tentative
Social Tendencies
Openness
Conscientiousness
Extraversion
Agreeableness
Emotional Range
Anger
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9
*Inscription: Writing God’s Words on Our Hearts & Minds*
*/Part 15: The Lamb of God/*
*Leviticus 1-7*
*/April 4, 2010/*
/ /
*Main point of sermon:*
· Jesus is the Lamb of God who death and resurrection took away the sins of the world.
* *
*Prep: *
·         Rob Bell, NAC
·         Carefully read about Sin Offering
 
*Scripture reading: Rev. 5:9-14 *(Sarah Dunn)
 
*Prayer*
 
As we celebrate Easter, we need to understand just what we are celebrating.
It is nothing less than the *grand* *climax* of a great story that you have been telling since the beginning.
Opening
 
Easter is churches’ “*big* *day*,” our Super Bowl.
I read an article saying I’m supposed to preach an *encouraging*, *practical* *message*.
Instead, I’m preaching a *doctrinal* message from *Leviticus*.
·         It’s probably the *1st* *Easter* *sermon* on Leviticus you’ve heard.
I © Leviticus
 
On its face Leviticus is an *instruction* *manual* for Israelite priests, filled with *laws* about *sacrifices*, *mildew*, *cleanliness*, and *festivals*, so I usually avoided it.
There are *few* *moral* laws, and *fewer* *stories*, just a lot of *rituals*.
We usually just *ignore* it as *antiquated* and *embarrassing*, but since I have to preach on it, I didn’t have that luxury.
·         The strangest thing happened as I’ve study it: I’m really *enjoying* *it* – it’s my favorite book of the Pentateuch.
It’s *not* a book of *rules*, but a *script* for this *cosmic* *drama*, a morality play, that teaches us about things like *sin*, *holiness*, *atonement*, and how to be *right* with *God*.
·         Instead of *actors*, you have the *priests* and *Israelites*, playing their parts with *deadly* *seriousness*.
And instead of a *stage*, you have the land of *Israel*, the *tabernacle*, *animal* *sacrifices*, *childbirth*, *funerals*, and many other parts of *daily* *life*.
Leviticus describes an incredibly *complex* *symbol*.
Think of *communion* or *baptism*, simple acts having *deep*, rich *meaning* of our redemption.
Rather than a simple act, it’s entire *way* of *life* was meant to teach *profound* *truths* about God and about us.
·         The book has one point: We *need* *Jesus*, he is the *Lamb* of *God* who death and resurrection took away the sins of the world.
It’s not frequently *quoted* in the NT (not many one-liners), but is the *framework* for the entire NT.
Buckets o’ Blood
 
Leviticus is filled with wild *images*, disturbing *pictures*.
The doctrine of our *depravity* and utter *sinfulness* and need for a savior isn’t *explained* in *didactic* form.
It’s *played* out in *flesh* and *blood*, literally, lot’s of blood.
Q   What is the *most* *blood* you have ever seen?
·         For me, it’s when it’s either when I cut my *foot* open with an *ax* or dropped a *steel* *beam* on *Micah’s* head.
I don’t know about you, but I *hate* seeing *blood*.
Last time I *gave* *blood*, I nearly fainted.
But *Leviticus* is filled with blood.
The first seven chapters are about *animal* *sacrifices*.
·         There’s more blood than all *Quentin* *Tarantino* movies combined.
The animal sacrificial *system* was *bloody*, to say the least.
For example: Many years after Moses, when Solomon dedicated the temple, he sacrificed *142,000 animals*.
(2 Chr.
7:5) Can you imagine how much *blood* *flowed* out of the temple?
·         All of this seems quite *brutal* to us, *barbaric* and doesn’t fit our idea of a *God* of *love*.
*Not* to *avoid* that, but just to give a different *perspective*: Literally *millions* more animals are “*sacrificed*” to our appetite for *meat* today than were ever killed on an altar.
·         Because we don’t watch it happen and get our nice *shrink*-*wrapped* flank steak, we *think* we are so much more *civilized*.
Q   *How* *long* does it take for us to *slaughter* *142*,*000* /cows/?
*36 hours* – about 100,000 are killed every day and about 25 million chickens.
That’s not from *PETA*, but the *USDA*.
I am not trying to make a *moral* *judgment* on that one way or that other, but just to point out we lack the *moral* *high* ground over the *ancient* *culture*.
Hopefully we can *respectfully* look at the world through *their* *eyes*.
Sacrifices in ANE
 
Sacrifices were a *part* of *life* for everyone in that day.
Pretty much *every* *culture* sacrificed animals to their gods.
It was no more *disgusting* to them than *carving* an *Easter* ham.
·         What made Israel’s sacrifices different from the surrounding pagan nations was their *purpose* and *meaning*.
The pagans sacrificed animals to *feed* their gods.
Their gods *needed* *sustenance*.
In pagan versions of the *Flood* *story*, the gods are worried because they just lost their food source.
Furthermore, the reason they would feed their gods is the *gain* their *favor* so they could get what they want.
They *gave* to their gods in order *to* *get*.
It was *manipulation*.
·         *BTW*: How often do we *worship*, *pray*, or *give* to God so we can *get*?
When we do that, we are no better than them.
Atonement
 
The pagans sacrificed because their *gods* *needed* it, Israel sacrificed because *they* *needed* it: Completely unlike pagans, their sacrifices were about *dealing* with *sin*.
There were several *types* of sacrifices in Leviticus, some for *sin* and some for expressing *thanksgiving* and *worship*, but at the root of all of these was “*atonement*.”
*Leviticus 1:3-4 *  3 ¶ “‘If the offering is a burnt offering from the herd, he is to offer a male without defect.
He must present it at the entrance to the Tent of Meeting so that it will be acceptable to the LORD.  4 He is to lay his hand on the head of the burnt offering, and it will be accepted on his behalf to make atonement for him.
·         *Atonement* is a one of the two *key* *themes* of Leviticus – it’s used *56* *times*, more than *half* of the entire uses in the Bible.
Leviticus describes *sin* and *unholiness* as these *constant* *forces* that pull us *away* from God (that’s the *other* *theme*, more on it next week).
The sacrifice allowed Jews to *bridge* the always *widening* *gap* between God and man.
*Leviticus 17:11 *  11 For the life of a creature is in the blood, and I have given it to you to make atonement for yourselves on the altar; it is the blood that makes atonement for one’s life.
The English word actually started as two words “*at* *onement*,” meaning to *reconcile* and *make* *peace* between two parties.
This follows the *Biblical* *meaning* of bringing peace between us and God *via* a *sacrifice*.
·         The sacrifice wasn’t *salvation* by *works*, but a gift of *grace*, so they could atone for their *sins* and be *reconciled* to God.
And so, in order to atone for the *ceaseless* *stream* of sin and *wickedness* that was constantly pulling them *apart* from *God*, a constant stream of *animals* had to be *sacrificed*:
 
·         Every *morning* and *evening*, for the *nation*.
(Ex.
29:38)
·         On *special* *days*, such as Passover, and esp.
Yom Kippur.
·         *Individual* *Jews* would offer sacrifices for their sins.
The Jew didn’t have the *theology* *textbooks* to explain sin and that God in his *justice* *must* *punish* *sin*, they had the daily *symbolism* played out before them.
First-hand EXPERIENCE
 
I want to *walk* you *through* the *process* so you can understand this *drama* God wrote into *Leviticus*, which was meant to show us our *need* for *Christ*, the Lamb of God.
Imagine you are an Israelite and you *slandered* your neighbor, had to *repent* *publically*, but you still have to *sacrifice* a *sin* *offering* to God.
Why?
Because *all* *sins* are *against* *him* first.
You would begin by choosing the *best* of your flock, not the runt, not the leftovers, but very best.
It would represent a *significant* financial *investment*.
·         In a *bartering* society, it was like *burning* *money*.
In *smaller* households, the animals would have been kept in the *house* at *night*.
Your *children* knew the lamb well, *played* with it, and named it.
·         I wonder if your children would *beg* you not to kill this lamb, but *your* *sin* had to be paid for.
You would take the lamb to the temple and place your *hands* on its head, the Hebrew says “*lean* on it” as if you are *forcefully* taking your sins and *pushing* it onto the *lamb*.
·         By this act, you were *saying* “I am a *sinner*.
I have *dishonored* God, and I *deserve* to *die*, but this *lamb* will die *instead*.”
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9