Sermon Tone Analysis
Overall tone of the sermon
This automated analysis scores the text on the likely presence of emotional, language, and social tones. There are no right or wrong scores; this is just an indication of tones readers or listeners may pick up from the text.
A score of 0.5 or higher indicates the tone is likely present.
Emotion Tone
Anger
0.17UNLIKELY
Disgust
0.51LIKELY
Fear
0.13UNLIKELY
Joy
0.48UNLIKELY
Sadness
0.57LIKELY
Language Tone
Analytical
0.63LIKELY
Confident
0UNLIKELY
Tentative
0.55LIKELY
Social Tone
Openness
0.82LIKELY
Conscientiousness
0.47UNLIKELY
Extraversion
0.08UNLIKELY
Agreeableness
0.77LIKELY
Emotional Range
0.74LIKELY
Tone of specific sentences
Tones
Emotion
Language
Social Tendencies
Anger
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9
Let us pray.
Most holy, Lord God, turn our hearts to you and your amazing grace, especially during this holy season; help us see the goodness of your creation no matter what may befall us, through Jesus Christ, our Lord.
Amen.
An African king had a close friend who had the habit of remarking “this is good” about every occurrence in life no matter what it was.
One day the king and his friend were out hunting.
The king’s friend loaded a gun and handed it to the king, but alas he loaded it wrong and when the king fired it, his thumb was blown off.
“This is good!” exclaimed his friend.
The horrified and bleeding king was furious.
“How can you say this is good?
This is obviously horrible!” he shouted.
The king put his friend in jail.
About a year later the king went hunting by himself.
Cannibals captured him and took him to their village.
Stacking some wood, setting up a stake and bounding him to it, they tied his hands.
As they were tying his hands, they noticed that the king was missing a thumb.
Being superstitious, they never ate anyone who was less than whole.
They untied the king and sent him on his way.
Full of remorse the king rushed to the prison to release his friend.
“You were right, it was good,” the king said.
The king told his friend how the missing thumb saved his life and added, “I feel so sad that I locked you in jail.
That was such a bad thing to do.”
“NO!
This is good!” responded his delighted friend.
“Oh, how could that be good my friend?
I did a terrible thing to you while I owe you my life.”
“It is good,” said his friend, “because if I wasn’t in jail I would have been hunting with you and they would have killed me.”
I think that the misfortune in our gospel reading is not that a man was born blind.
It was after he was given the gift of sight, he was persecuted.
But in spite of that persecution, the man born blind continued to see how great the world is and how fortunate he was.
He received a conversion.
His outlook was rosy no matter what and he responded to amazing grace with pledging allegiance to Jesus.
During Jesus’ second trip to Jerusalem in John’s gospel, he is taking a stroll.
His entourage is with him.
They encounter a man born blind.
Notice that the question they ask Jesus is not about how unfortunate his situation is.
They have the assumption that his blindness was caused by someone’s sin.
Their curiosity is only about who the sinner is.
This was the customary theological view of anyone’s misfortune.
Bad things happen to bad people.
Good things happen to good people.
Even if Jesus had a limp, the assumption would be that Jesus sinned, even though he may have just stubbed his toe.
They would also assume that a rich person is blessed by God, even if that person’s money came from embezzlement, robbery, or some other less than savory source.
Drug kingpins would be seen as blessed by God.
Jesus rejects this theological position.
Neither the man nor his parents sinned.
But his blindness will glorify God.
Now this had to be a head turner for the disciples.
How can someone’s blindness glorify God?
Why would God’s goodness be associated with something as terrible as blindness?
Jesus then talks about light and darkness.
The man born blind has known nothing but darkness.
Jesus is the light of the world.
Jesus is bringing light to all those who think that they see, but instead live in darkness.
The disciples, who see misfortune as punishment for sin, live in darkness.
Those who don’t see God’s love and care for all people, live in darkness.
Jesus came to bring us into the light of God’s greatness and love.
Jesus then put dirt and his spit in the man’s eyes.
Not exactly what we would expect to help someone see.
Part of the problem of seeing God’s goodness in the world is to set our minds on what we think we know to be true, not allowing new information to allow us to see what is really happening.
The people who knew the blind man merely assumed he was someone that must look like him.
It couldn’t really be him.
He is blind and will always be blind.
But the resemblance is remarkable.
Even though the formerly blind man insisted it was him, they still couldn’t believe it.
They needed confirmation by asking to see who did this miraculous thing.
Well, Jesus being Jesus, did this healing on the Sabbath.
It’s against the law to work on the Sabbath.
Isn’t it nice to have friends who are willing to take the time to escort you to the authorities?
That’s what happened to the former blind man.
Ironically, this seems to have gone on on the Sabbath.
The Pharisees then accuse Jesus of breaking the Sabbath law, while meeting to judge the law-breaker on the Sabbath.
The hypocrisy was probably not lost on John.
The Pharisees were divided concerning Jesus.
When asked, the former blind man testified that Jesus is a prophet.
Even the authorities could not believe that the former blind man was really blind.
So they summon his parents.
All this activity is occurring on the Sabbath.
They were reluctant to put themselves in jeopardy with the authorities.
The parent’s attitude was, “I know nossing!”
They were not legally required to testify about their son, once he reached the age of majority.
The authorities call the former blind man back to testify.
They have already decided that Jesus is a sinner and is worthy of arrest.
They need to get the former blind man to agree with their decision.
All the former blind man knows is once he was blind and now he sees.
Such amazing grace!
The former blind man could have a career as a successful litigator.
He asks the authorities if they want to be disciples of Jesus.
Now they are on trial.
They testify that they follow Moses.
That Moses talked to God.
That they know where Moses came from.
Jesus, they know nothing about.
Not only are they blind, but they are ignorant.
The former blind man says that God doesn’t listen to sinners.
God listens to people who love God and obey God.
Since no one has ever given sight to a man born blind, then Jesus must be from God.
Well, the authorities didn’t appreciate a theological lesson from a former blind man.
They did what people in authority do when they are painted into a corner.
They threw the former blind man out of the synagogue.
The former blind man now had no place to worship.
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9