Sermon Tone Analysis
Overall tone of the sermon
This automated analysis scores the text on the likely presence of emotional, language, and social tones. There are no right or wrong scores; this is just an indication of tones readers or listeners may pick up from the text.
A score of 0.5 or higher indicates the tone is likely present.
Emotion Tone
Anger
0.18UNLIKELY
Disgust
0.18UNLIKELY
Fear
0.15UNLIKELY
Joy
0.5LIKELY
Sadness
0.55LIKELY
Language Tone
Analytical
0.37UNLIKELY
Confident
0UNLIKELY
Tentative
0.31UNLIKELY
Social Tone
Openness
0.89LIKELY
Conscientiousness
0.87LIKELY
Extraversion
0.27UNLIKELY
Agreeableness
0.71LIKELY
Emotional Range
0.77LIKELY
Tone of specific sentences
Tones
Emotion
Language
Social Tendencies
Anger
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9
Theme: Our end is only a transition
Let us pray.
Most holy, Lord God, you are with us in this life and in the next; we give you thanks and praise for your loving-kindness that transcends all that may befall us, through Jesus Christ our Lord.
Amen.
So, here we are, left behind.
Did anyone have any friends or relatives disappear yesterday?
As far as I know, everyone I know is still here.
I also failed to see any hell and brimstone on my way to church this morning.
Remember when as a kid teams were picked and nobody wanted to be the last one picked?
What can be worse than the last one picked?
To be not picked at all.
That would be all of us.
Harold Camping of Oakland has a radio show on which he predicted for the second time the rapture of the righteous, leaving the rest to burn in hell.
This might be strike two.
I first saw Harold Camping on a Sunday night when we lived in Yuba City and I was clicking through the cable channels.
He was going on and on about what the Book of Revelation is saying.
Except what he was saying Revelation was saying is not what Revelation says.
So, I continued clicking.
When asked why his prediction of the rapture for yesterday was accurate when his previous prediction was wrong, Camping said that he failed to carefully examine the Book of Jeremiah.
Now that he has done so, he is convinced that he has the day right.
Harold Camping uses a complex set of number values that he seems to have made up himself.
He starts his calculations with the date of the flood in Genesis.
He dates the flood to 4990 BC.
Then doing a lot of ciphering with his imaginary numbers he comes up with May 21, 2011 as judgment day and October 21, 2011 as the end of the world.
Of course, there is no geologic evidence of a world-wide flood.
And if there was a world-wide flood where did all that water go?
Certainly, when you are in the midst of a cataclysmic flood, it seems like the end of the world.
There were several cataclysmic floods in the Middle East in ancient times.
They probably thought it was the end of the world.
Certainly for the people of the Mississippi River Valley, it seems like the end of their world.
The other problem is that there is no biblical warrant for a rapture.
The people who believe there will be a rapture take various verses of the Bible and put them together to prove their own assumptions.
Using this method, the Bible can support anything you want.
The third problem is what Jesus says.
Jesus was very clear that when the end times come we will not know the day or the hour.
In fact, Jesus might even take offense at Harold Camping for his trying to outwit Jesus.
When Camping’s judgment day comes, he will need to work that out with Jesus.
What we do know is that Jesus is with God and people have seen that with their own two eyes.
We don’t need to wait for a judgment day to know this.
Our first reading from Acts emphasizes Stephen seeing the Son of Man in heaven at the end of his trial before the religious authorities.
It is interesting to note that the religious authorities had no problem executing Stephen when the same authorities claimed to have no authority to execute Jesus.
Perhaps something changed politically or it really was the Romans who were intent on executing Jesus.
The Romans were likely in cahoots with the religious authorities to bring about Jesus’ death.
Stephen was blessed with the gift ecstatic visions.
There are others who also had this gift and many of them wrote down their visions of what they saw and heard from God and particularly Jesus.
We also have Old Testament stories of people who have these kinds of experiences.
This is a rare gift.
All of us have gifts given to us by God.
God expects us to use those gifts to help bring about the kingdom of God.
But for our purposes today in Easter season, Stephen saw the Son of Man at the right hand of God.
Well, what does this mean?
Since Luke did not record details of what Stephen saw and Stephen may not have provided details, we can’t know exactly what he saw.
The “Son of Man,” in Greek, literally means the son of humanity.
This could be any male.
Perhaps it once referred to humanity as a whole.
By the time of the first century, it became an apocalyptic term.
It is first mentioned in the Book of Daniel.
When the Son of Man comes, it will be the end times.
We do know that this was the last straw for the religious authorities.
They were so angry at this vision that they skipped past Stephen’s sentencing and went directly to his execution.
To have a being next to God implies there is more than one God.
This is blasphemy.
The penalty for blasphemy is death.
What were the charges against Stephen that caused his arrest and trial?
But before that, who was Stephen anyway?
Early in Acts, the apostles are running the show.
It was a mixed community of Jewish and Gentile converts.
The Gentile widows were not being looked after in the food distribution and the Gentiles complained to the apostles for this oversight.
The apostles determined that overseeing everything was too much for them and they delegated the care of the Gentile widows to seven men.
These men we think are the first deacons in the church.
Stephen was one of them.
This left the apostles more time for prayer and meditation.
These deacons did more than distribute food.
They did significant acts in helping to grow the church.
Stephen began speaking publically about his faith.
He garnered much attention and praise for his words.
Stephen may have also performed miracles.
When trying to teach the men of a synagogue about Jesus superseding the law, Stephen was accused of blasphemy.
False witnesses were paid.
Stephen defended himself admirably.
Then he had his vision.
St. Stephen’s feast day is December 26th and so we are usually not here to hear about him.
In Acts, Stephen is described as one “full of faith and the Holy Spirit.”
While they were stoning him, those responsible laid their coats at Saul’s feet.
It takes a lot of rocks to kill someone.
It takes work, so much so that it is easier for arm strength and for comfort from body heat to take an executioner’s coat off.
To give them to Saul is to acknowledge Saul’s authority for approving this death sentence.
When Stephen realizes that his life is ebbing, he repeats the words that Jesus said from the cross before Jesus’ death.
Violence is met with grace.
Revenge is met with forgiveness.
Stephen’s witness of grace at his death is the greatest witness a Christian can ever do.
Those who condemned Stephen instead become the condemned.
After this, Christians are persecuted and they flee Jerusalem.
The unintended consequence of this persecution and scattering is that the gospel is spread out to wider area.
More people hear the story of Jesus.
This Saul, who approved Stephen’s execution, went on to seek out and arrest other Christians.
He even went as far as Damascus.
While on the way, Saul was struck down and blinded by Jesus.
Saul recovered and changed his name to its Greek version, Paul.
He then became the greatest Christian theologian in history, St. Paul.
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9