Sermon Tone Analysis

Overall tone of the sermon

This automated analysis scores the text on the likely presence of emotional, language, and social tones. There are no right or wrong scores; this is just an indication of tones readers or listeners may pick up from the text.
A score of 0.5 or higher indicates the tone is likely present.
Emotion Tone
Anger
0.45UNLIKELY
Disgust
0.49UNLIKELY
Fear
0.14UNLIKELY
Joy
0.1UNLIKELY
Sadness
0.56LIKELY
Language Tone
Analytical
0.64LIKELY
Confident
0UNLIKELY
Tentative
0.2UNLIKELY
Social Tone
Openness
0.94LIKELY
Conscientiousness
0.63LIKELY
Extraversion
0.06UNLIKELY
Agreeableness
0.36UNLIKELY
Emotional Range
0.74LIKELY

Tone of specific sentences

Tones
Emotion
Anger
Disgust
Fear
Joy
Sadness
Language
Analytical
Confident
Tentative
Social Tendencies
Openness
Conscientiousness
Extraversion
Agreeableness
Emotional Range
Anger
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9
Introduction
Two weeks ago, we talked about Jesus healing the sick man who had been sick for 38 years on the Sabbath day.
To the Pharisees, this seemed to be a gross violation of the Law of Moses.
In fact, the Old Testament forbid the carrying of a burden on the Sabbath day, but this was more in context with the carrying of a burden in reference to buying and selling on the Sabbath day.
Jesus’ saw things differently.
To Him, the man was carrying a burden of sickness for 38 years.
How many Sabbaths had this man been burdened with this sickness without finding rest.
In comparison carrying a lightweight, flimsy straw mat was nothing in comparison.
It is this disagreement over the proper observance of the Sabbath which leads to the confrontation we look at today.
Exposition of the Text
Verse 16 says that the Jews were continually persecuting Jesus because he was doing these things on the Sabbath.
The English translation does not bring out the idea of an ongoing conflict between Jesus and the Pharisees.
The Greek indicates that the healing of this sick man on the Sabbath was just one of several incidents.
John has not included any other of these to this point, but we can see several such incidents recorded in the other Gospels.
The meaning of the verse is that the Jews were constantly accusing Jesus of being a habitual Sabbath breaker.
Not only this, but by commanding the man to take up his mat, he was teaching others, in their opinion, to break the Sabbath as well.
In versed 17, Jesus defends what he has done.
The verb “answered” here in the Greek is in the rare use of what is called the middle voice.
This gives the idea of “Jesus answered for himself” or simply “Jesus defended his actions, saying…” What Jesus says here in his defense is “My Father is always at work; therefore, I am working also.”
Even the Pharisees had to conclude from what we have of their writings that it was necessary for God to be continually at work.
What would happen to the universe if God took a day off?
Would the planets fall out of their orbits?
Or how would we feel if we came before God in an urgent prayer request and got the answer from God’s voice mail; “I am on vacation today, please call again later.”
In other places in the Gospels, Jesus reminded the Pharisees that they would lift their donkey out of a pit it had fallen into on the Sabbath day.
This would break the exact reference the Pharisees accused the man of doing, which is carrying a burden on the Sabbath day.
The implication that what one would do for an animal as an act of mercy is even more appropriate for a human being created in the image of God.
Jesus healed on the Sabbath day.
He was accused in the other Gospels that this, too, was a violation of the Sabbath.
Could you imagine how well the concept of Sabbath the Pharisees had would go over today?
Forget the Taliban!
Suppose you or someone you loved had a heart attack on the Sabbath day, and there was no one to answer at 911 because it was the Sabbath day.
And there are no doctors on call also, because it is the day of rest.
You can’t perform CPR, because it is work, and work is forbidden on the day of rest.
Any you better not pray either, because some would consider this work.
And if prayer itself were allowed, you would be petitioning God to work on his day off.
Anyone can plainly see that Jesus’ concept of the Sabbath was far superior to the Pharisees.
Yet God was about to take His second day off since the creation.
God the Son was about to be put in a tomb to rest on the Sabbath, having finished the new creation on the cross with the words, “It is finished.”
Just as God at the completion of creation on the sixth day, said, “It is very good.”
The words Jesus said on the cross is better translated “It has been made perfect” Rather than “finished”.
Having finished the work of the new creation starting on Palm Sunday, Jesus would take His Sabbath.
There is another subtle thought embedded in this verse as well.
It is true that the Law commanded the keeping of the Sabbath day and keeping it Holy.
It was also conceded even by the Pharisees that God was necessarily exempt from this requirement.
By Jesus saying that He was working on the Sabbath just like His Father was at work, He was making a claim that He was exempt from the Sabbath law.
If only God is exempt, then Jesus is claiming that He is none other than God Himself.
The Jews understood fully what Jesus said.
They were enraged even more than they were before and sought to kill Him because not only was Jesus in their eyes a habitual Sabbath breaker but a blasphemer as well because they understood Him as making a claim of equality with the Father.
The fact that Jesus did nothing to deny this ought to tell us who Jesus is.
Note that Jesus says “My Father” and not “Our Father”.
This can either be a claim of Jesus’ unique relationship to the Father or a claim that God was not their Father.
In fact it is both.
The unique relationship of Father and Son is described throughout the Gospel.
And in chapter 8, Jesus would flatly accuse the Jews who opposed them by saying “You are of your father, the devil!”
I would suppose if Jesus had been inclusive and said “Our Father” here, they would have been far less angry.
But Jesus is being very provocative here.
Salvation depends upon getting the person and work of Jesus right.
Jesus is not just a good man, a wonder worker, or a good teacher.
He is God the Son.
Therefore it is not enough to believe that Jesus was a good man or a martyr.
It is necessary to believe in Jesus not just about Jesus.
In verse 19, Jesus defends Himself again.
The same for of the verb “answered” is used here again.
The Jews were angry because they understood Jesus to be making a claim of equality of God.
Here would have been a perfect time for Jesus to tone down the rhetoric.
After all, he makes numerous statements in the Gospel to the effect that the “Father is greater than I.”
But not here-- in fact, Jesus boldly reasserts His unique relation to the Father.
Jesus claims that He is only doing the work His Father sent Him to do.
By saying this, He is telling the Jews that to accuse His actions is to accuse God.
To accuse God was to blaspheme God.
So Jesus is in the sense turning the tables on the Jews.
It was not Jesus who was blaspheming, but the Jews, just like His views on the proper meaning of the Sabbath was the true keeping of the Sabbath, whereas the Jews who thought they were keeping the Sabbath were actually breaking it by placing horrible burdens on the people.
It is also interesting to note the double amen which Jesus uses—translated “most assuredly” or “verily, verily”.
Amen is a Hebrew word which has the meaning “So let it be”.
In the Hebrew tongue, there is no comparative adjective like our “big”, “bigger”, and “biggest”.
The way to express the idea of “most truly” is to repeat the word.
Unlike our prayers which end with “amen”, “so be it”, Jesus begins his pronouncements with “Amen”.
And this is they way it should be.
We pray, hoping that what we have just prayed is on accord with the will of God and say “amen” with the sense of “If we have prayed according to your will, so be it.”
But it is not so with Jesus.
He already knows the Father’s will and can say the “amen” first, knowing that what follows is the truth of God and the will of the Father.
Verse 20 describes the intimacy between the Father and the Son in the words “For the Father eternally loves the Son”.
This love means the Father can trust the Son in all things, knowing that whatever the Father wills, the Son can be trusted to carry out.
The relationship of the Holy Trinity itself will be further developed in the prayer in John 17.
This verse also states that greater works than these were going to happen.
We know what these greater works were from this side of the cross; the first would be the lifting up of Jesus on the cross, his death, and resurrection.
The next is that Jesus would be the one who would raise the dead at the last day.
The third is that Jesus Himself would be judge.
What sad irony there is here that these very Jews who were judging Jesus were judging the very person they would have to stand before on the Day of Judgment.
The very Son whom the Father sent in love, that whosoever believed in Him should not perish but have everlasting life is also appointed to be the judge in the Final Judgment.
How great is God’s saving grace!
How painful is its’ rejection!
Those who come to Jesus in faith have Jesus as their Savior, but those who fail to believe have Jesus for their judge.
How important is is to get this right when where we spend eternity hangs in the balance!
In verse 23, we learn that it is the will of God that we honor the Son in the same way we honor the Father.
This means the Son is to be worshipped even as the Father is worshipped.
We cannot worship the Father unless we worship the Son also.
God has provided exactly one way to be saved.
To reject Jesus is to reject God.
And to reject God’s free pardon in Jesus Christ is to invite eternal punishment.
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9