Sermon Tone Analysis
Overall tone of the sermon
This automated analysis scores the text on the likely presence of emotional, language, and social tones. There are no right or wrong scores; this is just an indication of tones readers or listeners may pick up from the text.
A score of 0.5 or higher indicates the tone is likely present.
Emotion Tone
Anger
0.15UNLIKELY
Disgust
0.16UNLIKELY
Fear
0.13UNLIKELY
Joy
0.54LIKELY
Sadness
0.51LIKELY
Language Tone
Analytical
0.67LIKELY
Confident
0UNLIKELY
Tentative
0.31UNLIKELY
Social Tone
Openness
0.94LIKELY
Conscientiousness
0.72LIKELY
Extraversion
0.33UNLIKELY
Agreeableness
0.25UNLIKELY
Emotional Range
0.77LIKELY
Tone of specific sentences
Tones
Emotion
Language
Social Tendencies
Anger
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9
What is authority?
Or as some of the Postmoderns today ask: “Is there any authority?”
Is authority the mere power to impose values on others by force?
Is authority someone who is knowledgeable about a certain subject?
The question of authority is important here because the common people who heard the Sermon on the Mount were amazed at Jesus’ teaching because they perceived that His message had authority in it.
There was something about the person and teaching of Jesus that was different than the teaching of the Scribes and Pharisees.
What made Jesus’ teaching so authoritative?
The place to start here is with the Scribes and Pharisees.
Much of the Sermon on the Mount directly and openly challenged their teaching and practice.
The Pharisees considered themselves the authority for interpreting the Law and the Prophets.
They certainly knew more of what Scripture said than the common people, even if they were blind to its meaning.
As authorities, they imposed their authority on others.
They held their interpretation of Scripture over the people.
They administered discipline in the synagogues like a Sharia Law court does in Islam.
The people were kept in fear of the Pharisees and Scribes, even if some of them respected them for their learning.
The Pharisees looked down on the common people because of their “ignorance” of the Law.
These “people of the land” needed to be controlled and guided because they were incapable of running their own lives.
In other words, their attitude is similar to the current attitude in Washington, D.C. who think that Americans cannot act responsibly and need to be regulated for their own good.
When we look at the teaching of the Scribes and Pharisees, we discover that they were far from unanimous in their opinions on the Law and Prophets, just like the Supreme Court of the US rarely renders an unanimous decision.
The Pharisees were broken into two camps, the conservatives and the liberals.
The conservatives took to a more literal view of Scripture, whereas the liberals interpreted the Scripture to say what they thought it should mean if Moses were alive in their day.
They held to a living law that changed and developed over time.
In this, they act like the liberals on the Supreme Court who see the Constitution as being an outdated document which needs to be modernized by their interpretation to be made relevant.
Of course, by doing so, they break the spirit of the Constitution because the Constitution has the means of amendment built into it.
The Constitution is a document of the people to be understood by plain people.
It was not written for lawyers.
Yet the politicians in Washington do not believe that the people should have any power but should be dependent on the handouts.
The Scribes were the lawyers of Jesus’ day.
They wanted complete control over the interpretation of the Scripture.
The internal divisions the Scribes and Pharisees were internal to them just like the differences between Republicans and Democrats in Washington.
But the one thing they have in common is that they distrust the American people and think they need to be ruled over for their own good.
When the Tea Party arose in protest, Republicans were even more opposed to them than even the Democrats and did everything they could to slander them.
Even though some of them might have been worthy of censure, the group of politicians in Washington ought to consider their own scandals.
The common people of Jesus’ day held similar feelings about their leaders.
No one wants to be treated like a perpetual child.
They would hear the bickering among the followers of Hillel and Shammai over the correct interpretation of the Law.
This bickering caused confusion among them which destroyed their faith in the Law and the Prophets just like many Americans today are despondent about America.
The interpretation of Scripture by the Pharisees made Holy Writ a matter of multiple choice.
This of course led to partisanship.
It also led to the justification of a person’s conduct because one could always site a Rabinnic authority who would agree with their view.
Therefore, even though Scripture was held up formally in high esteem as the authority, the Scribes and Pharisees had stripped it of all authority but their own.
In other words, they abused the Word of God to suit their own schemes.
Jesus came as a shock to the Scribes and Pharisees.
He did not go to their Rabbinic schools.
He did not have a seminary degree or a license to preach.
He did not go through the proper channels of ordination.
This of course was a direct challenge to Judaism.
Besides the divisions among the Rabbi’s, there was also a huge rift between the priestly ruling class, the Sadducees and the Pharisees.
There were also many splinter groups like the Zealots, the Hellenists, and the Essenes.
They all hated each other.
But the challenge Jesus presented to them united them to get rid of Jesus, or so they thought.
This sermon which was preached early in the ministry of Jesus also challenged the Scribes and Pharisees directly.
He said that those who would follow Him must have a righteousness greater than the righteousness of the Scribes and Pharisees if they were going to enter the Kingdom.
They were the ones who failed to uphold every jot and tittle of the Law and Prophets and taught men so.
Jesus said that they would be the least in the Kingdom which I feel is an understatement.
They would not be in the Kingdom at all.
In fact, they would be in hell, unless they repented and believed on Him.
They are the ones that Jesus castigated for making long eloquent prayers in public as a show as well as disfiguring their faces to show they were fasting.
They bragged about their almsgiving.
The Scribes and Pharisees serve as the negative example throughout the greatest sermon that has ever been preached.
The common people, on the other hand, were far wiser than their rabbinic teachers.
They recognized something in Jesus that the Scribes and Pharisees were totally ignorant of.
They perceived the “Thus saith the Lord quality to Jesus’ words.
They recognized Him as a man of true authority.
They were the babes to whom God was pleased to reveal Jesus.
The “common people” are far more literal in their understanding of things.
They are less prone to twist words in lawyeresque fashion.
Jesus did not present the people with multiple choices on the interpretation of Scripture or even His own words.
Scripture means what God intends it to mean.
God is unchangeable, and so is everything which God says.
Unlike the Constitution which needs to be updated, but only by its own method, God’s word never needs updating.
Jesus states that He came to fulfill everything that was already written in Scripture.
He did not come to change a single jot and tittle of what had already been written.
Everything He said in the sermon is perfectly consistent with what was already written.
This is why Jesus answers the rich man in hell in the Gospel of Luke by saying Lazarus did not need to go to the man’s brothers to warn them.
They already had the Law and the Prophets.
The church today is beset by the same plague today as existed in the Israel of Jesus’ day.
We have all kinds of denominational authorities, each with their own opinions of Scripture.
This causes endless confusion amongst the members of the church.
Even the most liberal will quote Scripture as an authority when it is convenient to buttress their teaching.
Conservatives really do the same thing for the most part.
Everyone likes to prooftext.
Scripture is formally upheld as an authority, but its real authority is held hostage to the opinions of men.
Many ministers of the church have left their humble work as servants and strut around their titles.
These Reverend Doctor Wonderfuls go about like proud peacocks.
It has been nearly 500 years since the Protestant Reformation.
I am sure there will be some sort of grand celebration in the Protestant churches on October 31, 2017.
But I fear that this will be a hollow celebration.
The Protestant churches have become the very church they protested against.
The church of Luther’s day held the common people in check through ignorance.
They were told only what the priests and Poe wanted them to know.
The Doctors of the Church and the Magisterium held absolute authority over all matters of interpretation.
Unauthorized possession of the Scripture was punishable by death which included being burnt alive on a stake.
The church of that day was little better than that of those ISIS terrorists in Iraq today.
The church is drowning in its own irrelevance.
In fact, it is trying to find its relevance by aping the philosophies of this world in a desperate attempt to exist.
But the more they do so, the more irrelevant and dead the church will become.
There is no sword or barbeque pit the church can use to compel obedience to its teaching.
If the church becomes the world, then it has lost its saltiness and deserves to die.
There is no need for a church like that.
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9