Sermon Tone Analysis

Overall tone of the sermon

This automated analysis scores the text on the likely presence of emotional, language, and social tones. There are no right or wrong scores; this is just an indication of tones readers or listeners may pick up from the text.
A score of 0.5 or higher indicates the tone is likely present.
Emotion Tone
Anger
0.12UNLIKELY
Disgust
0.11UNLIKELY
Fear
0.1UNLIKELY
Joy
0.54LIKELY
Sadness
0.53LIKELY
Language Tone
Analytical
0.72LIKELY
Confident
0UNLIKELY
Tentative
0.55LIKELY
Social Tone
Openness
0.86LIKELY
Conscientiousness
0.38UNLIKELY
Extraversion
0.53LIKELY
Agreeableness
0.93LIKELY
Emotional Range
0.69LIKELY

Tone of specific sentences

Tones
Emotion
Anger
Disgust
Fear
Joy
Sadness
Language
Analytical
Confident
Tentative
Social Tendencies
Openness
Conscientiousness
Extraversion
Agreeableness
Emotional Range
Anger
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9
Introduction: If Peter was bold, brash, and unpredictable, Andrew, Peter’s younger brother, was the opposite.
In the group of apostles that was closest to Jesus we know the least about Andrew.
We probably know so little about Andrew because much of what he did he seems to have done in the background.
One thing we do know, however is that Andrew had a close relationship with Jesus.
Andrew was the first apostle to follow Jesus.
().
He was eager to follow Christ, and his personal eagerness to follow Christ bled over into his eagerness to bring others to follow Christ.
Peter and Andrew had obviously been life long companions with the other set of fishermen brothers James and John.
Andrew, Peter, James, and John apparently had spiritual interests before following Jesus since they must have taken time off of fishing to go hear the preaching of John the Baptist and became followers of John.
All four of these men displayed qualities of leadership.
Peter obviously displayed the greatest amount of leadership, but there were times that they would fight about who among them was the greatest.
Of the four leaders, Andrew was the least noticeable.
In fact, Andrew’s name only appears in the New Testament nine times (besides when his name appears in a list).
Mostly, Andrew lived his life in the shadow of his older brother Peter.
Even when John introduces him in his gospel he introduces him as Simon Peter’s brother (as if his significance hinged on the fact that Peter was his brother).
Surprisingly, Andrew shows very little resentment towards Peter.
In fact it was Andrew who brought Peter to Christ in the first place ().
Being Peter’s brother, Andrew knew Peter’s tendency to take over.
Andrew would have known that by bringing Peter to Christ he could kiss his chances of being the leader of the group goodbye.
This alone tells us a good deal about what kind of man Andrew was.
Almost everything the Bible tells us about Andrew shows us that Andrew had the heart and character necessary for effective ministry.
He did not seek to be the center of attention.
He was free from resentment towards Peter.
He was happy to use the good gifts that God had given him and allowed the other disciples to freely do the same.
Andrew also appears to be the disciple that is the most thoughtful.
Compared to the other disciples, Andrew is the center of the least amount of conflict.
Peter was likely to rush ahead foolishly and say the wrong thing at the wrong time, James and John were nicknamed “Sons of Thunder, “ but whenever Andrew speaks he always says the right thing and whenever he acts he does the right thing.
Obviously he was not perfect, but his imperfections are not recorded for us except for those mistakes he makes along with the other disciples.
He is never personally credited for leading dishonorably.
Even though he never took the spotlight, he was an effective leader.
Andrew serves as a model for us to follow today.
Like Andrew, most of us will serve the Lord in obscurity.
Book will not likely be written about you or me and it is our faithfulness in the little things that make a huge difference in the end.
Fittingly, Andrew’s name means “manly.”
He was bold, decisive, and deliberate.
He dedicated himself to truth and was willing to endure whatever he had to in the pursuit of and in service to the truth.
One of the First
Looking back at , Andrew was one of the first disciples with John.
After being convinced that Jesus was the Messiah, Andrew, without hesitation, went and found the person he loved the most - Peter - and brought him to Christ ().
The brothers then went back to continue their fishing business until Jesus found them again and called them into a more permanent full-time discipleship ()
Andrew was so unassuming that when Luke recorded ’s parallel passage Andrew’s name was not even mentioned.
Again, highlighting the fact that Andrew was content to live in the background.
It is this humility that gives Andrew the wisdom to see the significance of seemingly small things.
Seeing the Value of People
Andrew was known, not for bringing crowds to Jesus, but individual people to Jesus.
His first act after discovering who Jesus was was to go and get his brother Peter.
His first response to Jesus was to reach out to an individual.
At the feeding of the five thousand, it was Andrew who introduced the boy with the loaves and fishes to Jesus.
It was Andrew who introduced the Greeks to Jesus in
Why didn’t Philip take these men to Jesus himself?
I don’t know.
However, Philip knew that Andrew was the one who was gifted at making personal introductions to Jesus.
So, when someone needed a personal introduction to Jesus Philip sought out the leadership of Andrew.
Andrew seemed to always know what to do in these situations.
If someone wanted to see Jesus, Andrew was happy and comfortable making the introduction.
This is the most effective type of evangelism.
Effective evangelism often takes place on an individual, personal level.
Question: How did you guys come to know Jesus?
It would be awesome if we had a church populated with Andrews.
Andrew realized the value and the power of seeking out just one relationship at a time and bringing people one by one to Christ.
Never think that because you are uncomfortable speaking in front of people that you aren’t responsible to evangelize.
If you have friends, you can evangelize.
Seeing the Value of Small Gifts
So here is this huge crowd and Jesus asked Philip, knowing what kind of response he would give, where they might be able to buy bread.
After some calculations Philip finds that they have about 8 months wages ($33,000) and they need a year’s wages ($50,000; based on the lowest possible numbers).
Philip concludes that there is no possible way to buy enough food.
They might as well not worry about where to buy it because they can’t afford it.
Matthew records the conversation this way
Matthew
It is at this point that Andrew speaks up (
While all the other disciples must have been dumbstruck, Andrew knows that Jesus is not going to ask them to do something that they can’t do and so he looks around and finds the best he can come up with and trusts Jesus with the rest.
John then continues the story.
John 6:
The disciples learned that day that, in the hands of God, little can be used to accomplish much, and, even today, God chooses to work that way.
He uses small people and small gifts to accomplish much.
This illustrates that God does not need our gifts, he chooses to use our small gifts because He is a great God.
Seeing the Value in Service
As we mentioned earlier, Peter, James, and John would, at times, get caught up in the debate of who was the greatest.
Not Andrew.
He seemed to be more concerned about bringing people to Christ than about who would get the credit for bringing people to Christ.
In fact, we never see Andrew speak unless he is bringing someone to Christ.
He was not impressive like his older brother Peter and he probably liked it that way.
He isn’t bothered by the fact that he is living in someone else’s shadow as long as the work for Christ was getting done.
Andrew was a leader with a servant’s heart.
Andrew never appeared in Acts, never wrote an epistle, never founded a church.
Like in the gospels, he probably played a behind the scenes role in the formation of the early church.
After the filling at Pentecost we have no idea what happened to Andrew.
According to the historian Eusebius he was ultimately crucified in Achaia.
Tradition says he led the wife of a prominent Roman official to Christ.
Infuriated this Roman governor demanded she recant her faith.
She refused and so the governor had Andrew crucified.
He was then lashed to the cross so that he would last longer on it.
He hung there for two days.
He died bringing individuals to Christ.
Conclusion: Andrew’s ministry was extremely effective and it shows us that so often it is the little things that count - the individual people we touch or the unnoticeable life we live.
Andrew’s life is a testimony of .
Andrew’s life is an encouragement to us who live ordinary lives.
Reach out to your neighbor, listen for those who are seeking, introduce people to Christ.
By consistently being faithful in the little things, God can take something ordinary and make it extraordinary.
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9