Sermon Tone Analysis

Overall tone of the sermon

This automated analysis scores the text on the likely presence of emotional, language, and social tones. There are no right or wrong scores; this is just an indication of tones readers or listeners may pick up from the text.
A score of 0.5 or higher indicates the tone is likely present.
Emotion Tone
Anger
0.13UNLIKELY
Disgust
0.1UNLIKELY
Fear
0.15UNLIKELY
Joy
0.56LIKELY
Sadness
0.6LIKELY
Language Tone
Analytical
0.72LIKELY
Confident
0UNLIKELY
Tentative
0.32UNLIKELY
Social Tone
Openness
0.79LIKELY
Conscientiousness
0.48UNLIKELY
Extraversion
0.15UNLIKELY
Agreeableness
0.46UNLIKELY
Emotional Range
0.38UNLIKELY

Tone of specific sentences

Tones
Emotion
Anger
Disgust
Fear
Joy
Sadness
Language
Analytical
Confident
Tentative
Social Tendencies
Openness
Conscientiousness
Extraversion
Agreeableness
Emotional Range
Anger
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9
Self-Preservation Is One of our Most Basic Instincts
Cf. Patrick walking up to me—sling hand in front of my face...”ha! flinched!”
“You got me!
My silly reaction to imminent harm…!
There goes my manhood!”
In every dimension of living, we automate toward self-preservation
that’s what governs reflex actions
That’s why we diagnose self-destructive behavior as deeper problems
** But a higher order of thinking, feeling, and acting comes into play both because we are humans and—even more—because we are believers
Patrick asks for my cupcake… (have to think twice…)
Relationshis often require...
Problem, when feel imbalanced...
Now, I begin to see person as expense...
The ethical thing I have committed to becomes a chore to me—and even when I get it right, I have a hard time living with the loss I feel
Whether marriage or other relationship, as long as I feel like there is balance or safety, I am ok with some self-sacrifice; but when I feel those things being threatened, I tend to “turtle”.
the problem” often teh time that self-preservation is my most natural ersponse is a time when self-sacrifice is most needed.
That’s the backdrop of
Read
Here Paul follows up with a discussion of teh surrender of rights… But now it becomes much more praactically part of his story, and much more pointed for ours
You see ...
Surrender Only Works If It’s Free
** Otherwise, something in us keeps resisting even after the release.
Easily turns into grudges.
Cf.
Reconstruction in the South—Freedmen’s Bureau…Federal Troops…riots in MEM ans MSY...gave rise to groups incl KKK—1867- then Federal Enforcement Act…1920’s, … Last year, Unite the Right rally ended with death…harshness back and forth...
Cf.
Reconstruction in the South—Freedmen’s Bureau…Federal Troops…riots in MEM ans MSY...gave rise to groups incl KKK—1867-69…1920’s,
What remains certain is that Reconstruction failed, and that for blacks its failure was a disaster whose magnitude cannot be obscured by the genuine accomplishments that did endure.[5]
(Historian Eric Foner)
Full ownership of the choice
** The threat of surrender always has two components—my standing (sense of self) and my benefit (what I have to preserve) In fact, this really is about preservation—Actually—personhood and privilege
Cf. calling “shotgun” History of this… now, place of privilege…my kids’ place of honor…
So really, I have to have a firm grip of my sense of my personhood (which I am NOT conceding) and my privilege (which is mine, and I choose this)
Real quandary when I “don’t have a choice”
No one likes to lose their sucker
Full conviction in the process
Sometimes it looks like compromise.
In fact, Paul dealt with that.
His compromise was always legitimized.
In fact, sometimes we need to move beyond compromise.
NOte how Paul relates
This is us re: church (I mentioned this to a woman recently… concerned with not “watering down” the Gospel—actually waters down the Gospel by allowing our protectionism to prevail
Imagine applying this in any given moment to people we love
Imagine becoming ____ to the _____ (what other ways could you fill in those blanks?
Thanks be to God, that he gave me Stubborness, when I know I am right.Letter to Edmund Jenings, 27 September 1782, also quoted in John Adams (2008) by David McCullough, p. 272
When we must compromise, it may be best to not even think of it as compromise, but rather a surrender of the interests of a lesser law (self-preservation) to that of a greater law (law of love)
*** It is essential tat in the name of love we never compromise what is right before God.
Full awareness of the prize
Paul’s understanding of a prize stays with him, as it should us.
He knows what he is after...
That’s an issue with losing focus—thus Hebrews reminds of Jesus’s approach
It’s the Prize that Makes Surrender worth the Price
From this same auther we get so much prize imagery
What that does is changes it from an issue of surrender to an issue of exchange--
It’s not a surrender, it’s a swap
*** Read the moment—what is the swap available to me?
is there something more eternal
is there something more substantial
is there something more central to who I am and what I’m about
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9