Sermon Tone Analysis
Overall tone of the sermon
This automated analysis scores the text on the likely presence of emotional, language, and social tones. There are no right or wrong scores; this is just an indication of tones readers or listeners may pick up from the text.
A score of 0.5 or higher indicates the tone is likely present.
Emotion Tone
Anger
0.13UNLIKELY
Disgust
0.11UNLIKELY
Fear
0.14UNLIKELY
Joy
0.57LIKELY
Sadness
0.57LIKELY
Language Tone
Analytical
0.59LIKELY
Confident
0UNLIKELY
Tentative
0.79LIKELY
Social Tone
Openness
0.7LIKELY
Conscientiousness
0.75LIKELY
Extraversion
0.4UNLIKELY
Agreeableness
0.65LIKELY
Emotional Range
0.68LIKELY
Tone of specific sentences
Tones
Emotion
Language
Social Tendencies
Anger
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9
Prejudice and Partiality
As Paul pursues his goal of helping Timothy understand how a church should be, he focuses in our passage today on the Elders.
Elders is a Jewish term.
One finds the older men in the city joining together to make decisions for their community.
When Boaz wanted to marry Ruth, the inheritance and property claims were decided by the elders.
In the New Testament, the Elders were an office in the church.
One reason that Timothy faced some trouble was that he was not as old as the Elders who were guiding the church.
The church respected mature men with age and experience under their belts.
The verse I want to focus on is verse 21.
In the Greek language, the word “rules” is not in the text.
It literally reads, “I charge you to keep these without prejudging…”
What are the these?
The “theses” are the rules, instructions, commandments, suggestions, orders or whatever word you would use to summarize what Paul has said.
The translators of the ESV chose the word “rules,” the KJV uses the word “things” and the NIV the word “instructions” to fill the void.
The problem with rules or instructions is that we don’t apply them to everyone.
We give a friend a break or a free pass.
We give someone we don’t like a stricter standard to follow.
We treat our family with a different standard than we do those outside the family.
Nepotism is favoring family when giving responsibility or jobs to people.
We often hear about the “old boy network” where men and now this happens with women, show favoritism to those in their network.
Sometimes family members of close friends get different treatment than others in the job, the home, or the community.
Have you ever given a friend a place in line ahead of others?
Have you ever given a co-worker a break that you would not give others just because they are your friends?
Have you ever given someone you don’t like worse treatment than those you do like or even total strangers?
There are two lines that Christians should not cross.
We should not prejudge.
We should not show partiality.
If you have a different translation than the ESV, you have some other word than “prejudge.”
The idea here is discrimination.
Or we might say that we use our own preferences or prejudices in judging others.
Do you have prejudices?
How do you really feel about people “from away?”
What is your reaction when you see blacks, Asians, or people with colored hair, tattoos or rings protruding from every part of their body?
Do you prejudge?
It’s always been a problem.
The Jews and Gentiles were well known for their negative views of each other.
One can often read prejudices when people attack a group of people.
“Republicans don’t care about people.”
“Democrats are trying to buy votes by giving away money.”
These statements show prejudging people based on the group they are in.
Prejudging is almost always negative.
Christians should not prejudge.
Man looks on the outward appearance, the Lord looks on the heart.
Neither should Christians show partiality.
One can easily treat people who are part of their group, their family, their race, their circle of friends; differently than they treat those who would be outside.
Christians should not show partiality.
We are brothers and sisters in Christ and show not allow any other relationship to affect how we conduct ourselves in the church.
Where would this show up in the church?
Money
First, prejudice and partiality can show up in discussions of pay for the elders or pastor.
The church should always be willing to help leaders, especially those who labor in preaching and teaching, financially.
Even if the elder is an ox, the ox should not wear a muzzle as it treads out grain, but should be able to eat some of the wheat that it is pounding into grain.
The person who works deserves wages.
If any elder has financial hardship brought on by their service to the church, the church should help them out.
The laborer deserves his wages.
One of the poorest testimonies a Christian can have is to not pay his debts.
We are spending other people’s money when we buy stuff for ourselves and owe others money.
In the same way, the church must consider whether or not the elder or pastor has financial hardship as a result of serving the flock of God.
If so, the church should make its goal to relieve the person so that they can focus on ministry.
In today’s world, pastors would like to own a home, plan for retirement, help their children through college, afford health insurance, pay off debt and have enough to go out to eat every once in a while.
Many pastors are stressed because the financial pressures and the time pressures of serving in a church as well as working create special stresses in the family as well.
It’s one thing when a church can’t provide.
It is another when the church won’t provide.
It is a blessing when you know that people want the best for you, even when they may not be able to give it.
Verbal praise is wonderful, but it won’t feed hungry children.
When a pastor or elder is working full time for the good of the Christians, it is only right for the Christians to help the pastor or elder who is helping them.
Whenever it comes to money, it is easy for us to prejudge.
That person doesn’t need money.
That person doesn’t handle money well.
That person has relatives that can help them.
That person is not that good and we shouldn’t help them until they get better.
When it comes to financial help, let love be your guide.
What do you want for yourself that you consider reasonable?
Honor your pastor and leaders by providing for them what you would want for yourself.
One could see in Ephesus strong support from the Jews for a Jewish elder.
One could also see less enthusiasm for a Gentile.
We can easily prejudge the needs of others and dishonor them in so doing.
Wrongdoing
A second area in which we can prejudge or show partiality is when someone is accused of wrongdoing.
19 Do not admit a charge against an elder except on the evidence of two or three witnesses.
In other words, don’t believe what you hear, don’t pass on what you hear, unless what you hear comes from more than one witness.
I would encourage you to avoid gossipers.
By that I mean that often there is only one witness who tells several people and more than two of those people talk to you.
Those who repeat the charge are not witnesses.
There is only one witness at the source of all the talk.
Gossips are in danger of destroying someone’s reputation.
Go no further than the Kavanaugh’s hearings to understand the danger of accepting accusations from one witness with no collaborating witnesses.
I don’t care which side of the aisle you sit on, that whole affair was not handled in a godly manner.
The church should not accept testimony from one witness against an elder.
There are situations where the church would have a hard choice to make on this.
Many sins are done in private against one person, like sexual sins.
One would not have two witnesses to verify the sin.
I’m not sure that Paul is speaking to that circumstance.
I will say that a lot of the heat we have in society would not be present if we waited for at least two witnesses before we condemned someone.
Many elders and pastors have had ministries destroyed, reputations tarnished, as a result of one backbiting busybody who wanted to hurt them for some ungodly reason.
If we don’t like someone a little bit, it is easier for us to believe the bad that is said about them, to prejudge them as guilty.
Christians should not do that.
What if they are guilty?
First, the individual should be approached one on one with anyone with first-hand knowledge of that sin.
If you know someone has sinned, you have seen it and are a witness to it, you owe it to God, to the church, and to that person to speak to them privately about it.
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9