Sermon Tone Analysis

Overall tone of the sermon

This automated analysis scores the text on the likely presence of emotional, language, and social tones. There are no right or wrong scores; this is just an indication of tones readers or listeners may pick up from the text.
A score of 0.5 or higher indicates the tone is likely present.
Emotion Tone
Anger
0.47UNLIKELY
Disgust
0.15UNLIKELY
Fear
0.07UNLIKELY
Joy
0.59LIKELY
Sadness
0.22UNLIKELY
Language Tone
Analytical
0.68LIKELY
Confident
0.54LIKELY
Tentative
0UNLIKELY
Social Tone
Openness
0.94LIKELY
Conscientiousness
0.81LIKELY
Extraversion
0.35UNLIKELY
Agreeableness
0.51LIKELY
Emotional Range
0.7LIKELY

Tone of specific sentences

Tones
Emotion
Anger
Disgust
Fear
Joy
Sadness
Language
Analytical
Confident
Tentative
Social Tendencies
Openness
Conscientiousness
Extraversion
Agreeableness
Emotional Range
Anger
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9
Philippians 4:8, 9
Baptist Foundations
Challenges Facing Baptists in the Twenty-first Century
 
/Finally, brothers, whatever is true, whatever is honorable, whatever is just, whatever is pure, whatever is lovely, whatever is commendable—if there is any moral excellence and if there is any praise—dwell on these things.
Do what you have learned and received and heard and seen in me, and the God of peace will be with you/.[1]
What makes a Baptist a Baptist?
That question is at the centre of the search for Baptist identity.
There is no individual Baptist without a Baptist congregation.
Staunch advocates of believers’ church, Baptists must answer this question of identity together, as well as individually.
Eventually, the answer to this question will shape our churches, our denominational affiliations, and every aspect of our work together.[2]
During the coming two months, during each Sunday morning message I propose to explore those truths which define us as a people of God.
It is my observation that those truths which define us as Baptists are sadly neglected today.
Even denominational leaders and seminary instructors have permitted a dilution of Baptist theology during the past several years.
This is a trend which concerns me deeply, and which should concern each of us both as Christians and as those seeking truth.
The current generation of Baptists knows little about Baptist doctrine.
Consequently, contemporary Baptists invest considerable energies searching for some solid ground on which they can base their lives and Christian discipleship.
Tragically, this statement is made regarding denominational leaders and teachers in our theological institutions.
If those supposed to provide leadership prove to be ignorant of Baptist distinctives, should we marvel that those occupying the pews of our churches know so little concerning this rich heritage?
The tragedy of this censure is that our Baptist people are joining with non-Baptist evangelicals in an ever-expanding number of new ministry ventures.
This has become a virtual new evangelical ecumenism which continues to sweep over our Baptist Zion.
Areas of commonality and agreement have been identified with many of these evangelical Christians and even with other believers.
While this trend has positive elements, we have tended to neglect the traits that have forged our unique theological identity and shaped our mission and our passion in pursuing many of these ventures.
The result of this dilution of Baptist distinctives is that we have lost the power of our convictions and too often lost even our identity as a historic people.
If we are actually like all the other communions, then let us cease clinging to our identity and join with whoever gives us the best deal.
However, if we possess distinctive truths which mark us as a people, and if those distinctive truths make us the people we admire historically, then let us return to those truths and proudly proclaim them.
Our endeavour is not to proselytise non-Baptists to become Baptists, but it is to clearly articulate truths which may otherwise be neglected to the detriment of the whole of our world.
With the Word of God as our authority, we must relearn the basics and reclaim the richness of our doctrinal heritage.
We must rediscover a lost and neglected wisdom, and reconstruct the foundation and framework of our faith.
It is time that we were again about this task.
If we are to define what it means to be Baptist, it will be necessary that we establish the basis for every belief, the basis for every statement.
In order to do this we must agree upon a standard.
The standard for faith and practise is the Word of God, and in particular the standard for faith and practise, our authority, is the New Testament.
That truth needs to be explored thoroughly as we prepare ourselves for the future.
Baptists share many doctrines and practises in common with other religious bodies.
In common with Jews, we believe in one God, Creator of all things.
Many of the teachings of the Catholic Church are acceptable to Baptists.
With them, we believe in one God in three Persons—Father, Son and Holy Spirit.
We also believe in concert with those of the Roman Catholic persuasion in the incarnation, the atoning death and the glorious resurrection of Christ the Lord.
As is true of Catholics, we have high regard for the Scriptures as the written Word of God.
We do not hesitate to say that we share similar moral views with both Jews and Catholics and even with Mormons.
Nevertheless, we hold most truths in common with other evangelical denominations.
The whole body of evangelical truth belongs to all evangelical denominations.
We rejoice in the fact that the things in which we agree with them are more numerous and more important than the things in which we differ.
We join with such evangelical denominations in holding to precious truths such as the inspiration of Scripture, the existence of one God in three Persons, the necessity of the new birth through repentance and faith, salvation by grace and not by works.
We hold in common with other evangelical groups the deity, substitutionary death, resurrection, ascension and Second Coming of Christ Jesus; a final judgement, with eternal blessedness for the redeemed and eternal death for the wicked.[3]
Throughout the whole of Christendom, there are differences in church polity, church sacraments and ordinances, church officers and the conception of the church.
This does not begin to address the differences in the doctrines of salvation, the authority of creeds and the worth of the individual before God.
It is in these areas that Baptists have distinguished themselves and served to bring a great hosts of evangelical Christians into amazing agreement during the past three centuries.
Certain truths must be stated at this point, which you do well to keep in mind before we consider the challenges facing Baptists in the 21st Century.
First, *Baptists are not Protestants*.
Protestant denominations are those which protested against the sinful abuses of the Roman Catholic Church and finally severed their relationship with that church.
It was the intent of the Reformers to establish new religious orders in order to return to the teachings of the New Testament.
Unfortunately, not one of the Reformers carried through on their intent, for each brought out of the Catholic Church doctrines and practises which are out of harmony with the New Testament.
Such corrupt practises include: union of church and state; infant baptism; pouring or sprinkling as the mode of baptism; a hierarchical form of church governance.
Baptists did not come out of the Catholic Church; hence, in the strictest sense, they are not to be classed as Protestants.
Baptists are evangelicals, but they are not Protestants.
A second important truth is that *there is no modern founder of Baptists*.
Martin Luther was the founder of the denomination which bears his name, and well may the various Lutheran sects be proud of the part their great leader had in bringing about the Protestant Reformation.
We Baptists honour Martin Luther as a great Reformer and a stalwart of the Christian Faith.
Methodists began with the ministry of John Wesley, though Wesley Himself never forsook the Anglican Communion.
Presbyterians look to John Calvin as their founder.
The Anglican Church was born during the religious controversy under Henry VIII, as an offspring of the Roman Catholic Church.
The Disciples of Christ, the Christian Church and the Churches of Christ all trace their beginning to the teachings of Alexander Campbell in the early part of the nineteenth century.
Campbell was excluded by conscientious Baptists who saw that he was beginning to teach doctrines which violated their basic tenets, and so he started a new denomination.
The Foursquare Church was the result of the ministry of Aimee Semple McPherson and the Pentecostal Assemblies of Canada grew out of the Azusa Street Revival in Los Angeles, California.
Nevertheless, there is no founder of Baptists.
A final truth which will prove helpful as we consider the challenges facing Baptists in the new century is that *Baptists recognise no founder but Christ*.
Although the name Baptists was not used to designate a particular group until a few centuries ago, and thought it may not be possible to trace Baptist history back to the apostles without a break, it is true that Baptists are a Bible-made people, and Baptist principles and practises have lived through the centuries.[4]
Baptist Distinctives — When I came to faith in Christ the Lord, I did what some believed to be a strange thing.
After the fact, my actions seem quite reasonable, but at the time, I appeared radical to some dear friends.
I wrote on a sheet of paper a list of major doctrines.
To the right of each doctrine, I provided two additional columns.
One column bore the title “I believe this,” and the other column was entitled “I do not believe this.”
I then purchased a wide-margin Bible and began to either affirm or deny each doctrine in its turn by reading through the Bible.
A doctrine is naught but biblical truth expressed in some convenient and concise language.
What better way to learn doctrine than through reading the Bible?
As I encountered a truth concerning a given doctrine, I would note it by underlining the relevant verses, noting the doctrine(s) involved in the margin, and citing other references in the margin of the Bible.
By the time I had read the Bible through, I had a rather thorough grasp of biblical doctrine.
Later, I learned that this was known as developing a biblical theology, in contradistinction to a systematic theology.
When I had completed my studies, I was a Baptist.
What is a Baptist?
A Baptist is distinguished by a set of distinctive doctrinal truth.
As previously noted, we share many doctrines in common with other Christians.
Certainly, we share in common with all Christians, faith in the Triune God.
We believe, together with all who are Christians, that Jesus is very God and fully man.
Likewise, we share with all true believers the conviction that Jesus died a sacrificial death, that He was buried and that He raised on the third day from the tomb.
We believe, together with all Christians, that the Risen Son of God ascended into heaven, from whence He shall return to judge the living and the dead.
We believe that faith in Him is both mandatory and sufficient for salvation.
Whilst these truths are held in common with all Christians, it is nevertheless true that certain convictions distinguish us from other believers.
Together with most evangelical believers, Baptists hold that Bible to be authoritative for faith and practise.
However, Baptists are insistent that it is the Bible alone which is the basis for our faith.
This position has been historically identified as a Baptist position.
Though we are aware of traditions, we do not elevate our traditions to the same level of authority as we do the Word of God.
Baptists are insistent that we must find biblical warrant for every practise and for each doctrine.
Those areas in which the Bible is silent are to be viewed as areas of freedom for us as a people of God.
Therefore, the first great Baptist distinctive is that the Scriptures alone are authoritative for our faith and practise.
We are insistent upon the Lordship of Christ.
Consequently, it is our insistence upon His mastery which impels us to reject all baptismal modes except for that which He has given in the Word—immersion.
We dare not alter that mode, knowing that Christ Himself gave us the mode and knowing that the Word is quite explicit in declaring the purpose for that mode.
We submit to His reign, leading to another Baptist distinctive.
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9