Sermon Tone Analysis

Baptizing the Dead

6.

What Is the Baptism for the Dead?

1 Cor 15:29 is sometimes taken to mean that the early Christians practised baptism by proxy.

After they had been converted to Christianity, it is held, they desired to convey the benefits of their faith to their departed friends who had died in paganism, by having themselves baptized “in their behalf,” perhaps on their graves.

We have no evidence from history that such a practice prevailed in the early Christian churches.

Nor does the text suggest it.

The Gr preposition hupér expresses also the motive that may prompt a person to a certain action.

In this case the motive was suggested by the dead, viz.

by the dead in so far as they shall rise.

The context shows this to be the meaning: If a person has sought baptism in view of the fact that the dead are to rise to be judged, his baptism is valueless, if the dead do not rise.

See BAPTISM FOR THE DEAD.

W. H. T. DAU

BAPTISMAL REGENERATION, bap-tizʹmal rē̇jen-ēr-āʹshun: As indicated in the general arts.

on BAPTISM and SACRAMENT, the doctrine ordinarily held by Presbyterians, Congregationalists, Baptists, Methodists, and also by Low-Church Episcopalians, differs from that of the Roman and Greek churches, and of High-Church Anglicans, in its rejection of the idea that baptism is the instrumental cause of regeneration, and that the grace of regeneration is effectually conveyed through the administration of that rite wherever duly performed.

The teaching of Scripture on this subject is held to be that salvation is immediately dependent on faith, which, as a fruit of the operation of the Spirit of God in the soul, already, in its reception of Christ, implies the regenerating action of that Spirit, and is itself one evidence of it.

To faith in Christ is attached the promise of forgiveness, and of all other blessings.

Baptism is administered to those who already possess (at least profess) this faith, and symbolizes the dying to sin and rising to righteousness implicit in the act of faith (Rom 6).

It is the symbol of a cleansing from sin and renewal by God’s Spirit, but not the agency effecting that renewal, even instrumentally.

Baptism is not, indeed, to be regarded as a bare symbol.

It may be expected that its believing reception will be accompanied by fresh measures of grace, strengthening and fitting for the new life.

This, however, as the life is already there, has nothing to do with the idea of baptism as an opus operatum, working a spiritual change in virtue of its mere administration.

In Scripture the agency with which regeneration is specially connected is the Divine “word” (cf 1 Pet 1:23).

Without living faith, in those capable of its exercise, the outward rite can avail nothing.

The supposed “regeneration” may be received—in multitudes of instances is received—without the least apparent change in heart or life.

The above, naturally, applies to adults; the case of children, born and growing up within the Christian community, is on a different footing.

Those who recognize the right of such to baptism hold that in the normal Christian development children of believing parents should be the subjects of Divine grace from the commencement (Eph 6:4); they therefore properly receive the initiatory rite of the Christian church.

The faith of the parent, in presenting his child for baptism, lays hold on God’s promise to be a God to him and to his children; and he is entitled to hope for that which baptism pledges to him.

But this, again, has no relation to the idea of regeneration through baptism.