Sermon Tone Analysis

Overall tone of the sermon

This automated analysis scores the text on the likely presence of emotional, language, and social tones. There are no right or wrong scores; this is just an indication of tones readers or listeners may pick up from the text.
A score of 0.5 or higher indicates the tone is likely present.
Emotion Tone
Anger
0.12UNLIKELY
Disgust
0.09UNLIKELY
Fear
0.08UNLIKELY
Joy
0.62LIKELY
Sadness
0.44UNLIKELY
Language Tone
Analytical
0.65LIKELY
Confident
0.4UNLIKELY
Tentative
0UNLIKELY
Social Tone
Openness
0.9LIKELY
Conscientiousness
0.79LIKELY
Extraversion
0.49UNLIKELY
Agreeableness
0.72LIKELY
Emotional Range
0.77LIKELY

Tone of specific sentences

Tones
Emotion
Anger
Disgust
Fear
Joy
Sadness
Language
Analytical
Confident
Tentative
Social Tendencies
Openness
Conscientiousness
Extraversion
Agreeableness
Emotional Range
Anger
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9
Introduction
Hook:
Paul has written a lengthy letter full of dense, robust instruction.
The gospel, the good news of Jesus’ life, death and resurrection, is the power of God for salvation for everyone who believes
People need salvation because every person is hopelessly broken and has rejected and rebelled against God, thus trading the source of all life for idols that will only bring death
God has provided a way by which sinners can be justified before him, forgiven of their sins, freed from the chains of their sins, and redeemed from the law: Jesus, who offered his life as a propitiation, that is, a substitutionary sacrifice where God’s just and righteous wrath would be averted from us and poured out on Jesus
This must be believed and received with faith
As a result, God has reconciled us to himself and made peace with us
He has adopted us into his family as sons and daughters
He has put his own Holy Spirit in us to guide us, help us, teach us, convict us, and make us more like Jesus
Why has Paul written this letter?
Why does Paul give such instruction?
Is it because the Roman Christians were deficient in some way?
Was Paul dissatisfied with something in their community and felt the need to correct it?
Were they way off track and needed to be steered back in the right direction?
NO!
It was exactly BECAUSE they were gospel people that Paul wrote to them.
I.
We are a gospel people who still need the gospel
Paul was writing to gospel people
Full of goodness
Full does not equal occasionally good; rather, they have a plentiful supply of goodness
They have a consistent and characteristic desire to be and do good, with a contextual bent toward holding the good of each other in high regard
In other words, they had a consistent concern for what was good not just for themselves but for their church and community
Filled with all knowledge
A robust understanding of the Christian faith, genuine comprehension of the gospel, the teachings of Scripture
A true gospel oriented worldview, not informed primarily by the cultural norms of the day but by the scriptures that bear witness to Jesus
Able to instruct one another
Goodness + knowledge = ability to instruct one another
Desire to do good without knowledge is impotent
Knowledge without goodness is malicious
Instruct = admonish, correct what is going off track
Mutual obligation and accountability, part of what it means to be a member of a church
Every member of the church has the obligation to help each other toward spiritual maturity
None were so wise that they had nothing more to learn, and none were so inept that they had nothing of value to share.
None were so wise that they had nothing more to learn, and none were so inept that they had nothing of value to share.
Robert H. Mounce, Romans, vol.
27, The New American Commentary (Nashville: Broadman & Holman Publishers, 1995), 266.
A Few Honest questions
Is our church characterized by these things?
How do we need to grow?
Where are we strong, where are we weak?
Where do you need to grow as a member of this church?
Do you have a robust enough understanding of the scriptures to give biblical counsel to your brothers and sisters?
Have you cultivated a desire not just for knowledge in order to be right, but genuine concern for the good of your brothers and sisters?
Sometimes Christians have a tendency to just want to have knowledge of the Bible and use it as a club to beat people up with
Sometimes Christians give profoundly unbiblical counsel because they don’t actually understand the scriptures very well
We are a gospel church - we are defined only and always by the gospel, our response to it by faith in Jesus, and our proclamation of it
Some of you are asking, “what other kind of church could we even be?”
GREAT QUESTION!
“Gospel Church” is kind of redundant - like saying “organic apples,” because all apples are organic, but we have to nevertheless label them to differentiate, emphasize and make sure that an essential quality is known and understood
Paul was writing to a gospel people that still needed the gospel
The Roman church is in good shape; why then does Paul write these things?
Because he was writing to a gospel community that still needed the gospel.
Why?
Because gospel people still need the gospel; we have to continually be reminded of it
Because we drift
Our default direction is not to drift toward Jesus
No one accidentally matures in their faith in Christ
Because we never graduate from the gospel
Every issue of great importance comes back to the gospel - we begin our journey in Christ by receiving the gospel, and we continue it by the gospel
First example, serving in the church is ultimately a gospel issue
Why I serve is a gospel issue - If God has given everything for me, the only right response is to give everything to him
How I serve is a gospel issue - if Jesus is ultimately the Lord of my life, all that I do is not for the purpose of pleasing my boss or friend or family, but ultimately under the Lordship of Jesus, which is why Paul says in Colossians to work heartily as for the Lord and not for men, knowing that you are really serving the Lord Jesus.
On what basis I serve is a gospel issue - what qualifies me to serve in God’s house is not my greatness or competency
Some of us have a tendency, on the basis of past sin, regret, brokenness, that we are disqualified from service in some fashion
Does the blood of Christ redeem us from our sins or does it not?
If you are redeemed by the blood of Jesus by receiving him in faith and repentance, on what basis can you disqualify yourself from ministry?
To be sure, a person cannot lead in the church while simultaneously rejecting the Lordship of Jesus by continuing in unrepentant sin, but that’s a whole different animal than “I am disqualified because of past sin that I have repented of”
Second example, Leadership is a ultimately a gospel issue
I am not ultimately the leader of this church, nor are the elders: Jesus is the ultimate pastor and leader of this church
The gospel changes leadership
Rather than being in a place of authority over others, I am under the authority of Jesus to serve his people in the way he tells me to
My leadership is not about what I want to achieve, but the mission that God wants to achieve
My leadership is not about pleasing my constituents, but about presenting a people holy and blameless before God by the power of the gospel - I don’t really care if you are comfortable and happy all the time, I care if we are together living out our belief in Jesus in every sphere of live
Gospel people still need the gospel, because no matter how far we have come, we still have a long way to go
All issues of great importance are ultimately gospel issues
Gospel people still need the gospel, because no matter how far we have come, we still have a long way to go
Transition
Paul’s qualification for writing to this church: even though he had never been there, God had appointed him as apostle to the gentiles
God had given Paul a mission to preach the gospel to the gentile world
II.
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9