Sermon Tone Analysis

Overall tone of the sermon

This automated analysis scores the text on the likely presence of emotional, language, and social tones. There are no right or wrong scores; this is just an indication of tones readers or listeners may pick up from the text.
A score of 0.5 or higher indicates the tone is likely present.
Emotion Tone
Anger
0.55LIKELY
Disgust
0.12UNLIKELY
Fear
0.58LIKELY
Joy
0.58LIKELY
Sadness
0.59LIKELY
Language Tone
Analytical
0.33UNLIKELY
Confident
0UNLIKELY
Tentative
0.56LIKELY
Social Tone
Openness
0.93LIKELY
Conscientiousness
0.59LIKELY
Extraversion
0.24UNLIKELY
Agreeableness
0.65LIKELY
Emotional Range
0.71LIKELY

Tone of specific sentences

Tones
Emotion
Anger
Disgust
Fear
Joy
Sadness
Language
Analytical
Confident
Tentative
Social Tendencies
Openness
Conscientiousness
Extraversion
Agreeableness
Emotional Range
Anger
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9
Introduction
Peter and John had been under great pressure before when Jesus was arrested by both the Temple guard and Roman soldiers.
Peter made a temporary and futile attempt at bravado before he caved miserably.
The two of them followed at a distance and came into the courtyard outside.
John remained silent, while Peter, when confronted, denied Jesus three times.
After this, Peter ran out and hid with bitter tears.
John remained silent.
He had failed also.
Jesus called them to be bold witnesses.
It looked as though all was lost.
But nothing is lost with God.After the resurrection, Jesus came to the disciples who had, as predicted, utterly failed with craven fear.
they had locked the doors for fear of the Jews.
But Jesus would not be stopped by the locked door.
He needed to come to them.
Over a forty day period, He convinced them that He had indeed bodily risen from the dead (Acts 1:3).
He told them that they were to be witnesses, first in Jerusalem, then in Judaea and Samaria, and then to the uttermost parts of the earth.
But they still were not ready.
They needed to wait for the descent of the promised Holy Spirit.
This happened on Pentecost.
what a difference that would make!
Not long after Pentecost, Peter and John were coming to the Temple to pray, as was their custom.
A lame man who had never walked was carried and set before the gate called “beautiful.”
Peter and John commanded that in the name of Jesus, this man should rise and walk.
The first thing the man did was to do what no lame man could ever do.
He entered into the Temple.
And he did not do this silently.
He was leaping for joy and making quite a ruckus.
He was shouting out God’s praise.
This provided an opportunity for the gospel.
Everyone wanted to know what was going on.
they knew that the man could not walk.
One can just look at the deformity of his feet and know that he was not putting on a show in order to get donations.
The people gathered together at Solomon’s Porch where the Rabbis taught.
Peter and John had no rabbinic credentials to preach there.
To the Jewish leaders, they were “agrammatoi” and “idiotai” in Greek.
( Acts 4:13 ) The first word means “without letters” or “having no credentials.”
The second Greek word needs no definition.
The only credentials they possessed was that an undeniable miracle had happened to the lame man.
Peter and John did not brag about their own power as some “Pentecostal” and “Charismatic” preachers do today on television.
they centered everything on Jesus.
This is how we know they had the Holy Spirit, as the Gospel of John quotes Jesus as saying that the Holy Spirit would not center upon Himself, but would rather lift up Jesus and make His deeds and teachings understandable.
Even though we rightly assert that the Holy Spirit is equally God with the Father and the Son, the Spirit subordinates His role to that of Jesus, just as Jesus subordinated His role to the Father.
Jesus did not come to speak His own words, but the words the Father had given Him.
Peter and John waxed bold.
They told the crowd to stop marvelling at them and instead fix their attention upon the message.
This was not their doing but God’s.
Peter told them that the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, their God, had glorified Jesus.
They had betrayed the One whom the Father had glorified.
The Greek verb translated “handed over” is the same one which is used for Judas’ betrayal.
They betrayed a brother to a Gentile ruler, Pilate.
They were responsible of killing the author of life itself.
They commanded the people to repent as they had done this ignorantly in unbelief.
(For more information, read “They Don’t Preach like this Anymore” in this archive.
The net result of this preaching was that Peter, John, and apparently the man who had been healed were thrown into a holding cell.
They would be kept until the High Priest, some of his family and leaders could be assembled to try this matter.
Peter and John were in considerable danger.
The Sanhedrin did not think of betraying Jesus to Roman authority, contrary to the Torah.
They would think no less about having them put to death.
The Exposition of the Text: Acts 4:5-22
( Acts 4:5-6 )
It must have been a long night.
Some people call jail “the cooler.”
It serves as a time of reflection as well as a means of intimidation.
Was it worth the trouble that they had gotten into to preach and teach boldly in the name of Jesus.
The leaders hoped that Peter and John would repent of their actions and leave off teaching and preaching in Jesus’ name.
they hoped that they would recant their error and receive the admonition of the leaders not to repeat such a folly.
the leaders feared the wrath of the people, so to hope the fervor would die down seemed like a pragmatic approach.
( Acts 4:7 )
Peter and John were stood before the council.
They were asked in what power or what name they had done this miracle of healing.
By saying “power” the council was trying to accuse them of using demonic power to heal the man.
They had accused Jesus of the same before when they said that he cast out demons by Beelzebul, the prince of demons.
The “what name” is the same as saying “Who gave you the authority to do this?”
The extra “you” at the end of the Greek sentence is stressing that Peter and John were responsible for the “evil” they had done.
this was meant to instill fear into Peter and John.
( Acts 4:9-10 )
But this time, Peter and John did not stand down like thy had at Gethsemane.they were fully aware of the seriousness of the situation.
This is because they were now full of the Spirit.
Peter boldly answers them: “If you want an answer today why this good work was done to the invalid man and how he was made well who is standing before you healthy, then let all of you and all the people of Israel know, it was in the name of Jesus Christ of Nazareth, whom you crucified and whom God raised from the dead .
that this man stands in front of you whole.”
This is bold preaching.
Let us examine what Peter is saying.
The Council was accusing Peter and John of doing an evil work.
Peter says is is a good work.
They were accused of using witchcraft, but Peter clearly says that it was in the authority of Jesus of Nazareth.
It was they who had perpetrated evil as they crucified Jesus of Nazareth.
But God raised Jesus from the dead.
They had thought that had rendered Jesus impotent by slaying Him.
But God made Him stand again.
This invalid could not stand, but now in the name of Jesus, He now stands before you.
Look at him for yourself.
Acts 4:11-13 ( Acts 4:11-14)
Peter goes on to further explain what had happened to Jesus.
He quotes the 118th Psalm.
( Psalm 118:22 )This is an important prophecy about Jesus Christ.
(To study more on this, see: The Day the LORD has Made in this archive.
Jesus was the stone the builders scornfully rejected.
He has been made the chief corner stone.
The corner stone is the stone by which the entire building is oriented and stands.
Not only was Jesus raised, but ll of Israel is built upon Him.
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9