Sermon Tone Analysis
Overall tone of the sermon
This automated analysis scores the text on the likely presence of emotional, language, and social tones. There are no right or wrong scores; this is just an indication of tones readers or listeners may pick up from the text.
A score of 0.5 or higher indicates the tone is likely present.
Emotion Tone
Anger
0.53LIKELY
Disgust
0.47UNLIKELY
Fear
0.11UNLIKELY
Joy
0.17UNLIKELY
Sadness
0.5UNLIKELY
Language Tone
Analytical
0.64LIKELY
Confident
0UNLIKELY
Tentative
0.74LIKELY
Social Tone
Openness
0.92LIKELY
Conscientiousness
0.37UNLIKELY
Extraversion
0.11UNLIKELY
Agreeableness
0.82LIKELY
Emotional Range
0.56LIKELY
Tone of specific sentences
Tones
Emotion
Language
Social Tendencies
Anger
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9
“The Witnesses”
John 5:32-47
Introduction:
People have two choices to make about the claims of Jesus Christ.
They are either real or they are false.
Christ is either the God in Flesh that He said that He was or He is the biggest phony and liar the world has ever known.
Listen, the thing that we need to understand is that people do not ride the fence of this issue.
They either believe the claims or they do not.
I was speaking to person just a couple of weeks ago and they were telling me that they did not know whether or not they believed all of the things that I was telling them or not.
As if coming to that conclusion would give them some kinds of safety come judgment time, because they were not sure.
There is not such thing, you need to understand this.
You either believe it or you don’t.
And disbelief always turns to hostility.
People stand at the cross either with those who love him or those who nailed but it never with those who are not sure.
So we come to our next section is our study and Jesus begins in verse 30-31 which we will use as an introduction and then begin the outline in verse 32.
Jesus says in verse 30 that does nothing of Himself.
Again, nailing them in their accusations earlier when Jesus told them that if you are accusing me you are accusing the Father because I do nothing of myself.
He does not act independently of God.
In other words, you cannot accuse me without accuse God.
Now, notice verse 31.
Now that's been kind of a mysterious statement to a lot of people.
They say, "Wait a minute, does Christ say there that He's not telling the truth?"
Not at all.
When you understand the context and you understand the dialogue and what's going on, it's very clear what He's saying.
He's saying, let me read it this way, "In your opinion or in your estimation, if I am the only one to testify about who I am, that's not good enough."
Right?
He's saying you're not going to believe just Me, you've got to have some other witnesses.
In your own mind it's not enough for Me to claim this, just on My own.
And, you know, He's got a good point.
I mean, I could stand up in the pulpit and say, "I want you to know, ladies and gentlemen, that I am God...I'm God." Now I doubt very seriously whether there would be anybody who would believe that.
You'd say, "Oh yeah?
Well I'm not going to believe it just because you said it."
In effect that's what Jesus is saying here.
He's saying if I'm the only one claiming to be God, you're not about to believe Me.
You don't like Me anyway, you want to get rid of Me.
Now that sets the stage for Christ bringing four witnesses about His deity.
The Forerunner’s Witness; The Finished Works; The Father’s Word’s ; and the Faithful Writings.
I. The Forerunner’s Witness (vs.
32-35)
The Forerunner is, of course, John the Baptist that we have looked into in some detail in the past.
Christ realizing that the Jews would not believe the witness that He made about Himself begins to call in certain witnesses to bear record of the truth about Him.
The first witness that He calls in is John the Baptist.
Now, Jesus in verse 32 brings back to us an OT principle.
Now, would the testimony of Jesus be enough?
Yes, for those who already believed in Him.
There is no doubt that the followers of Jesus Christ already believed every word that He had said about Himself.
However, His own testimony would not be enough for those that did not believe.
They would have the attitude, “Well, of course you would say this about yourself you are trying to get a following, but we need more proof than just your testimony about yourself.”
Which, again, is why Jesus said what He did in verse 31, because He knew that the people would not believe His own testimony about Himself.
Now, the OT law made a wonderful provision for this that is alive and well in our court systems today, the principle of witnesses.
In Dt. 17:6 and Dt.
19:15, the law is handed down by God through Moses that only at the word of two or three witnesses should a matter be received as true.
If only one person makes a claim, good or bad, it should not be established, but at the consistent word of two or three other people the saying should be established.
This is repeated, at least in a narrower sense, in the NT in 1 Tim.
5:19, speaking about the Elders.
And Jesus Christ knowing the unbelief in their hearts is going to go beyond the criteria of the OT and bring in four witnesses to the truth about Him and He begins with John the Baptists.
He begins with a reminder to the Jews in verse 33, “You have sent to John….”
Jesus would have made an excellent prosecutor.
In His first statement to the people He makes an amazing comparison.
He reminds them that they went to John.
John did not run up to the palace of Caesar or the home of the High Priest and begin to shout about the Messiah.
Jesus reminds them that they went to John; so they must have taken some veracity in what he said.
Back in chapter 1 of John’s Gospel verse 19-27, the text tells us that the Jews sent priests and Levites to see John to ask him questions.
According to Luke not only did the Priests and the Levites come but also did the Publicans and the Soldiers.
John had a massive following.
Jesus said that when you came to John he bore witness of Me.
Now, the wonderful comparison is found back in chapter 3:26.
Remember when we looked at that passage and some of the followers of John were becoming jealous of the popularity of Christ?
They began to question John about Him and in verse 26 they reminded John of the one that He bore witness to beyond Jordan.
Now, the wonderful thing that Christ brings into this, and I know that they remembered this when Christ spoke in verse 33, is the fact that not only did the Jews sent to John, but many of them believed John and followed him.
Christ, in this statement, reminds them that they were curious enough to find him and ask him questions, and then reminds them that they believed him enough about the Christ to follow him.
Amazing comparison and reminder.
Now notice verse 34.
Jesus sets the record straight that He does not need a human testimony.
He tells them that I am not telling you about John the Baptist for My sake.
Christ does not need John to remind Him of who He is.
This is for their sake.
Jesus does not need men telling Him who He is, He knows who He is.
Jesus did not have John out there for his health.
He did not have him point to Him and say, “Behold the Lamb of God….”
He did not have him out there to remind Christ of who He is.
He had him out there, why? “….that you might be saved.”
Human testimony is not for the sake of Christ, human testimony is for our sakes.
That was the only reason that Christ had John out there was for a witness, not to remind Him of who He was, but so the people could be saved.
Now right there we introduce two important truths.
And this is something you can remember, this is kind of a overriding truth in many things in the Christian experience.
Now listen to this.
Human testimony is important but it is weak theoretically.
In other words, a lot of people say, "Well how do you know that Christ is really real?
I mean, how do you know that Jesus Christ can change your life?"
"Well I know because He did it to me.
I know Christ is real because I walk with Him.
I know what He's like because I love Him and I share His life in me and I read the Word of God and He speaks to my heart.
And I know because I've experienced Him."
That's all right.
That's kind of exciting, in fact.
But you know what?
There's a big problem with that and that's this, you know something, even if you never did experience Him He'd be real, right?
If nobody in this world ever believed in Jesus Christ He'd still be the Son of God, wouldn't He? So, you see, you can't make Christ the Son of God just because you've experienced it.
He's the Son of God whether you experience Him or not.
So from a theoretical standpoint, that criterion for judging Jesus Christ is lousy.
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9