Sermon Tone Analysis

Overall tone of the sermon

This automated analysis scores the text on the likely presence of emotional, language, and social tones. There are no right or wrong scores; this is just an indication of tones readers or listeners may pick up from the text.
A score of 0.5 or higher indicates the tone is likely present.
Emotion Tone
Anger
0.09UNLIKELY
Disgust
0.08UNLIKELY
Fear
0.07UNLIKELY
Joy
0.59LIKELY
Sadness
0.16UNLIKELY
Language Tone
Analytical
0.74LIKELY
Confident
0.23UNLIKELY
Tentative
0UNLIKELY
Social Tone
Openness
0.98LIKELY
Conscientiousness
0.6LIKELY
Extraversion
0.11UNLIKELY
Agreeableness
0.44UNLIKELY
Emotional Range
0.67LIKELY

Tone of specific sentences

Tones
Emotion
Anger
Disgust
Fear
Joy
Sadness
Language
Analytical
Confident
Tentative
Social Tendencies
Openness
Conscientiousness
Extraversion
Agreeableness
Emotional Range
Anger
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9
SYSTEMATIC FORMULATION
1.
The eternal preexistence of Jesus as the Son of God is a necessary corollary of his deity.
It has “formed the seed-plot of all Christological and Trinitarian reflection.”
Those who in Christian history have denied his deity have usually denied his preexistence; Arius, as noted, did make a place for created, but not eternal, preexistence.
2. The eternal preexistence of the Son of God makes possible an incarnational self-emptying of the Son.
Any doctrine of kenōsis must proceed from the preexistence as well as from the deity of the Son of God.
3. The eternal preexistence of the Son of God is not merely a topic for abstract speculation, but it relates to divine salvation.
It is designed to answer the question: Is the Redeemer eternal and divine?
It poses the negatively designed query: Is God’s love in Christ truly “triumphant” if Christ be not eternal?
4. The eternal preexistence of the Son of God makes possible an immanental Trinity and not merely an economic Trinity.
5.
There are limits to our understanding of the eternal preexistence of Jesus as the Son of God.
“We cannot know the pretemporal as we do the earthly life of Christ, or even as we do (in a real sense) His life of exalted glory.”
Theodor Haering wrote:
The love of God which was effective for us in Christ as the Son, is so truly the love of God, the effective Revelation which he makes of His own nature, that it is eternally bestowed on Him, the Bringer of this eternal love, not only in the sense of ideal pre-existence, not only on Him as the correlative in the world’s history of the eternal love of God, but also, apart from His earthly existence, as the love of the Father to the Son in the mystery of the eternal life of God, and therefore, as no other word is available for us, in a state of real pre-existence.
The Eternality and Pre-Existence of Christ
Eternality
The subject of Christ’s eternality deals with the fact that He has always existed as a person from eternity past, with no beginning and no end.
The Scriptures give at least three lines of evidence for this fact: direct biblical statements, the deity of Christ, and His role in creation.
Direct Biblical Statements
Four biblical passages clearly ascribe eternality to Christ.
The first, Micah 5:2, declared that Judah’s future deliverer, who would rule in Israel on God’s behalf, would be born in the small town of Bethlehem.
Because humanity is born, but deity is not, this part of the declaration revealed that the Messiah would be a human being.
The next part asserted that this same person’s “goings forth have been from of old, from everlasting.”
Concerning this statement, D. K. Innes wrote, “These words are suited to convey both the ancient lineage of Christ as a descendant of the family of David and also His eternal pre-existence” (“Some Notes on Micah” in Evangelical Quarterly, 41, no. 3 [1969], p. 170).
Because eternal existence is an attribute of deity, but not of humanity, this part of the declaration ascribed deity to the Messiah.
Thus, Micah 5:2 indicated that the Messiah would be a God-Man, a unique being with deity and humanity existing in the same person.
His humanity would have a beginning through conception and birth, but as a divine person, He is eternal—without beginning.
Two things should be noted regarding this prophecy.
First, in spite of the fact that the mother and foster father of Jesus Christ lived in the city of Nazareth (Lk.
1:26–33), as the result of an imperial decree of Rome, He was born in Bethlehem (Lk.
2:1–7) in fulfillment of Micah 5:2.
Second, the ancient Jews understood Micah 5:2 to be speaking of the Messiah.
This is revealed by the following events: Wise men from the east came to Jerusalem and asked King Herod, “Where is he that is born King of the Jews?” Herod asked the chief priests and scribes where the Messiah should be born.
They answered, “In Bethlehem of Judæa,” and quoted Micah 5:2 as their proof (Mt.
2:1–6).
The second biblical passage that contains a direct statement about the eternality of Christ is Isaiah 9:6.
In a context describing the future rule of the Messiah, this passage applied the name “The Everlasting Father” to Him.
Franz Delitzsch stated that this name designated the Messiah “as the possessor of eternity” and as the one who would rule His people like a loving, faithful father (Isaiah, Vol. 1, Commentaries on the Old Testament, p. 253).
The third direct statement passage is John 1:1–3.
Referring to Christ as “the Word,” the Apostle John stated, “In the beginning was the Word…The same was in the beginning with God” (vv.
1–2).
He thereby asserted that Christ already existed with God before everything that had a beginning first began.
Christ existed in eternity past before any part of creation came into existence.
Concerning John’s statement, Leon Morris wrote, “The verb ‘was’ is most naturally understood of the eternal existence of the Word” (The Gospel According to John in The New International Commentary on the New Testament, p. 73).
The fourth biblical passage is Hebrews 7:3.
The writer declared that Christ had “neither beginning of days nor end of life.”
Concerning this declaration, Leon Morris stated, “The writer is, of course, speaking of the Son’s eternal nature, not of his appearance in the Incarnation” (Hebrews, Vol. 12, The Expositor’s Bible Commentary, p. 64).
The Deity of Christ
The deity of Christ is the second line of evidence for His eternality.
Deity’s nature is to be eternal.
Thus, the Apostle Paul signified that eternality is one of God’s attributes (1 Tim.
1:17).
The Scriptures present the deity of Christ; therefore, He too must be eternal by nature.
The biblical evidence for Christ’s deity will be examined in a later article.
Christ’s Role in Creation
The Apostle John asserted the following truth concerning Christ: “All things were made by him; and without him was not anything made that was made” (Jn.
1:3).
Christ played a significant role in the creation of everything that has ever been created.
That work required His existence in eternity past before creation began.
If Christ had not existed before the beginning of creation, He could not have been involved in the creation of everything that has ever been created.
The Apostle Paul declared the same truth about Christ when he wrote, “For by him were all things created…all things were created by him, and for him; And he is before all things” (Col.
1:16–17).
Herbert M. Carson said, concerning these statements about Christ by John and Paul: “Here it is the Son in His eternal being who is being described, rather than the Son as incarnate.
In fact, there is a close parallel between this passage and John’s teaching concerning the eternal Word or Logos.
The only-begotten is also the agent of creation…Far from being in any way a part of creation, the Son is before all things….He is eternal, while creation is in time” (The Epistles of Paul to the Colossians and Philemon in Tyndale New Testament Commentaries, pp.
42–43).
The Issue of the First-Born of All Creation
In Colossians 1:15 the Apostle Paul referred to Christ as “the first-born of all creation.”
Some individuals and groups insist that this designation indicates that Christ was the first part of creation that God brought into existence.
They claim that Paul was teaching that Christ is a created being, that He had a beginning in time and therefore is not eternal.
Does the expression “the first-born of all creation” mean that Christ was the first thing created?
No, it does not.
Paul was not saying that Christ is a created being.
Several things prompt this conclusion.
First, Paul wrote Colossians to refute a heresy (Gnostic Judaism) that taught that Christ was part of creation.
Second, the idea that Christ was created is contrary to the context of Paul’s reference to Christ as “the first-born of all creation.”
The context teaches that Christ created everything that has been created (vv.
16–17).
Thus, F. F. Bruce wrote, “The context makes it clear that this title is not given to Him as though He Himself were the first of all created beings; it is emphasized immediately that, far from being part of creation, He is the One by whom the whole creation came into being” (Commentary on the Epistle to the Colossians in The New International Commentary on the New Testament, p. 194).
Third, there was a Greek word (protoktistos) that meant “first-created.”
Paul did not use it here, and it is never used of Christ in the Bible.
When Paul referred to Christ as “the first-born of all creation,” he was teaching that Christ existed before and is sovereign over all of creation.
Fourth, the word that Paul did use (prototokos) had two connotations: priority and sovereignty.
Priority had two possible sub-connotations: the first part of something or existence before something.
The context of the word determines which sub-connotation is intended.
The Colossians 1 context demands the sub-connotation of existence before something (vv.
16–17).
Thus, when Paul referred to Christ as “the first-born of all creation,” he was teaching that Christ existed before and is sovereign over all of creation.
F. F. Bruce stated, “What the title does mean is that Christ, existing as He did before all creation, exercises the privilege of primogeniture as Lord of all creation, the divinely appointed ‘heir of all things’ (Heb.
1:2).
He was there when creation began, and it was for Him as well as through Him that the whole work was done” (Ibid.).
Pre-Existence
Pre-existence and eternality are not necessarily the same.
This is evident because a human being can exist before a certain event, but that does not mean he is eternal by nature.
Thus, when reference is made to the pre-existence of Christ, the emphasis is not necessarily upon His eternality.
Instead, it is upon the fact that He existed before His incarnation in human flesh.
He existed before He was born of the virgin Mary.
There are several evidences for the pre-existence of Christ.
The Eternality of Christ
Several lines of evidence have been examined for the fact that Christ is an eternal being, without beginning or end.
The fact that He is eternal by nature prompts the conclusion that He existed before His incarnation.
Christ’s Claim of Pre-Existence
On one occasion when Christ was confronted by enemies, He said, “Your father, Abraham, rejoiced to see my day; and he saw it, and was glad” (Jn.
8:56).
His enemies challenged Him by saying, “Thou art not yet fifty years old, and hast thou seen Abraham?” (v.
57).
Jesus responded with an astonishing claim: “Verily, verily, I say unto you, Before Abraham was, I am” (v.
58).
The word translated “was” in this statement literally means became or came to be and refers to Abraham’s birth (William F. Arndt and F. Wilbur Gingrich, A Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament, p. 157).
Thus, through that statement Christ was claiming that He existed before Abraham was born.
In light of that fact, the additional fact that Abraham lived approximately 2,000 years before Christ’s incarnation forces the conclusion that Christ existed before His own human birth.
Pre-Incarnate Appearances of Christ
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9