Sermon Tone Analysis
Overall tone of the sermon
This automated analysis scores the text on the likely presence of emotional, language, and social tones. There are no right or wrong scores; this is just an indication of tones readers or listeners may pick up from the text.
A score of 0.5 or higher indicates the tone is likely present.
Emotion Tone
Anger
0.53LIKELY
Disgust
0.08UNLIKELY
Fear
0.11UNLIKELY
Joy
0.52LIKELY
Sadness
0.56LIKELY
Language Tone
Analytical
0.65LIKELY
Confident
0UNLIKELY
Tentative
0.74LIKELY
Social Tone
Openness
0.79LIKELY
Conscientiousness
0.19UNLIKELY
Extraversion
0.23UNLIKELY
Agreeableness
0.59LIKELY
Emotional Range
0.43UNLIKELY
Tone of specific sentences
Tones
Emotion
Language
Social Tendencies
Anger
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9
Gen 14:14-16
INTRODUCTION
He Ain’t Heavy…He’s my brother.
Those iconic words have symbolized the spirit of Boys Town for decades.
But many people don’t know how it originated.
Back in 1918, a boy named Howard Loomis was abandoned by his mother at Father Flanagan’s Home for Boys, which had opened just a year earlier.
Howard had polio and wore heavy leg braces.
Walking was difficult for him, especially when he had to go up or down steps.
Soon, several of the Home’s older boys were carrying Howard up and down the stairs.
One day, Father Flanagan asked Reuben Granger, one of those older boys, if carrying Howard was hard.
Reuben replied, “He ain’t heavy, Father… he’s m’ brother.”
Well, this is not true all the time.
The truth is:
He is Heavy Sometimes!
As we observe Abram’s nephew Lot, we see that he was more of a burden than a blessing.
Maybe that’s the reason the Lord told Abram not to take him in the first place.
The Lord knew what Abram did not.
see Gen 12:1
Abram was 75 years old, and had not learned that sometimes it is for your own good that you leave relatives where they are.
No doubt he had a special relationship with his dead brother, Haran’s son.
The story says at Gen 12:4
Abram probably was saying of Lot: He ain’t heavy, he’s my brother.
But what he did not know was that Lot was:
Faithless Gen13:5-11
Wait a minute, that is not all, he also proved to be:
Fleshly See Gen 13:12
Think with me for a moment where Lot lived after the separation of he and Abram.
The text says that “Lot settled in the cities of the valley.”
This does not sound like he settled anywhere because “cities” means more than one.
it appears he roamed to and fro, in and out of cities in plain.
Something else interesting to note in the narrative is that he moved his tent as far as Sodom.
The KJV says that he pitched his tent toward Sodom.
I had to know what that meant so I consulted with Paul Kissling’s article from THE COLLEGE PRESS NIV COMMENTARY on this passage and discovered :
Abram remains in the Promised Land of Canaan while the now affluent herdsman Lot moved his tents near to the city of Sodom.
He is now in some sense or other a city dweller, albeit one who still lives in tents since he lives “in” or “among” (בְּ, be) the cities of the plain, near Sodom.
When next we meet him, he has moved into the city of Sodom (Gen 14:12).
Lot’s story would remind the original readers (and dare I say us too!) of the real dangers of becoming too comfortable in the midst of pagan culture.
The influence is gradual enough as to be unnoticeable.
Also See Gen 14:12
As we read the end of Lot’s story, he was a Foolish man
Foolish See Gen 19:30-38
CENTRAL IDEA: He may be heavy at times, but he is still my brother.
We Are Relatives Gen 14:14
The text uses the word “relative.”
According to the
62a אָח (ʾāḥ) II, brother.
62b אַחֲוָה (ʾaḥăwâ) brotherhood.
62c אָחוֹת (ʾāḥôt) sister.
אָח (ʾāḥ).
Brother, relative, fellow countryman, friend.
From a root common to all Semitic languages, ʾāḥ occurs 630 times in the OT.
Owing to its wide range of meanings and the practice of polygamy, it is sometimes necessary to describe a full brother as the son of one’s mother (Deut 13:6 [H 7]; Ps 50:20; Jud 8:19).
The relationship between full brothers was extremely close, so the admonition to kill a brother who has become an idolater is severe indeed (Deut 13:6 [H 7]).
Every man is expected to be his brother’s keeper (Gen 4:9).
The OT is replete with stories about half-brothers, those with different mothers.
Abraham was Sarah’s half-brother (Gen 20:5, 12), and his sons Ishmael and Isaac were born to Hagar and Sarah.
The rivalry between Joseph and his half-brothers turned into hatred (Gen 37:2–5), and Absalom’s hatred for Amnon resulted in murder (II Sam 13:29).
Even full brothers like Cain and Abel, or Jacob and Esau had similar experiences.
The Levites, however, properly put loyalty to God above family solidarity when they killed their own sons and brothers guilty of idolatry (32:29).
More remote descendants from a common father are called brothers.
Thus “brother” occurs together with “children of Israel” (Deut 24:7).
“Brother” is used more widely of Abraham’s nephew Lot (Gen 13:8) and Laban’s nephew Jacob (Gen 29:15).
Members of the same tribe are also called “brothers.”
fellow-Levites (Num 16:10) or Simeonites (Num 25:6).
The “relatives” of Samson among whom he should have selected a wife probably refer to his own tribe of Dan (Jud 14:3).
As we look at this bible story today, let us be mindful of the relatives who are like Lot.
You have tried bring them along with you, help them land on their own two feet only to discover that they are Trifling, Tricky, and Treacherous.
Relationships Encounter Conflict
In light of what Lot did to him, when Abram heard that his relative had been taken he went into action to help him.
I believe the Lord is trying to show us that relationships will encounter conflict.
There has been conflicts in the family since sin entered the world.
CONFLICT, INTERPERSONAL The Bible illustrates, explains, and offers solutions for interpersonal conflict.
Among the more notable instances of interpersonal conflict recorded in the Bible are the hostilities between Cain and Abel (Gen.
4:1–16), Abram and Lot (Gen.
13:8–18), Jacob and Esau (Gen.
25–27; 32–33), Jacob and Laban (Gen.
29–31), Saul and David (1 Sam.
18–31), Mary and Martha (Luke 10:38–42), Jesus’ disciples (Mark 9:33–37; Luke 22:24–27), Paul and Barnabas (Acts 15:36–41), and the Corinthian believers (1 Cor.
1:10–12; 3:2–4; 11:18).
The root cause of interpersonal conflict is sin (Gal.
5:19–20).
James explains that fighting is the result of uncontrolled passions and desires (James 4:1–3).
The book of Proverbs characterizes those who stir up conflict as persons given to anger (Prov.
15:18; 29:22), greed (Prov.
28:25), hate (Prov.
10:12), gossip (Prov.
16:28), and worthless perversions (Prov.
6:12–15).
Such conflicts inevitably result in personal destruction (Prov.
6:15), discord (Prov.
6:14), and strife (Prov.
10:12; 16:28).
It is no wonder that “the Lord hates … who stirs up trouble among brothers” (Prov.
6:16, 19 HCSB).
Has there ever been any conflict with relatives that has caused a separation?
Conflicts Don’t Negate Relationship
Even though Lot sought to defraud Abram by choosing the fertile Jordan Valley he was still family.
So when Abram heard the about Lot’s capture and deportation, he sprang into action.
I wonder how many of us would have done that after what he had done to Abram.
I see hear another lesson that the Lord would teach us today: Conflicts do not negate relationships.
Although there was a separation there still was a family bound that could not be broken by the disagreement.
it does not matter how much you cut me, you are still my brother.
I may not be able to have you around me but it does not negate the fact that if a relative needs my help, I should do what I can to help them.
See Gen 14:14-16
CONCLUSION
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9