Sermon Tone Analysis

Overall tone of the sermon

This automated analysis scores the text on the likely presence of emotional, language, and social tones. There are no right or wrong scores; this is just an indication of tones readers or listeners may pick up from the text.
A score of 0.5 or higher indicates the tone is likely present.
Emotion Tone
Anger
0.13UNLIKELY
Disgust
0.13UNLIKELY
Fear
0.1UNLIKELY
Joy
0.51LIKELY
Sadness
0.59LIKELY
Language Tone
Analytical
0.48UNLIKELY
Confident
0UNLIKELY
Tentative
0.62LIKELY
Social Tone
Openness
0.83LIKELY
Conscientiousness
0.59LIKELY
Extraversion
0.21UNLIKELY
Agreeableness
0.32UNLIKELY
Emotional Range
0.58LIKELY

Tone of specific sentences

Tones
Emotion
Anger
Disgust
Fear
Joy
Sadness
Language
Analytical
Confident
Tentative
Social Tendencies
Openness
Conscientiousness
Extraversion
Agreeableness
Emotional Range
Anger
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9
Intro/Scripture
Collaboration with my friend, pastor Adam Mustoe.
He leads a congregation in the suburbs of Kansas City.
He and I worked on this series together…which is first of all just fun for me.
But this is also a topic, cancel culture, that is nuanced, difficult, and layered so I appreciated a conversation partner.
Adam and I will be hosting a live podcast on Tuesday nights at 7pm on our facebook page where people from both of our congregations can join and ask questions or just listen to a lively conversation.
We will have other pastors join us as well.
Pray.
This is an ancient piece of pottery.
In Greek the word was “ostraca.”
Shards of broken pots were in plentiful supply.
This is where we get the word “ostracized.”
Annually the citizens of Athens would be able to vote on one citizen to ban from the city for 10 years.
They would vote by writing a name on the ostracon.
Whoever got the most votes with a minimum of 6,000 would have to leave the city in a matter of days.
They’d been ostracized.
Centuries later another method of public humiliation was invented: the pillory.
Described this way by Nathanial Hawthorn in the Scarlett Letter: “An instrument of discipline, so fashioned as to confine the human head in its tight grasp, and thus hold it up to public gaze.
The very ideal of ignominy was embodied and made manifest in this contrivance of wood and iron.
There can be no outrage, methinks…more flagrant than to forbid the culprit to hide his face for shame.”
This punishment by public shame was outlawed in the United States in the late 19th century.
Fast forward to the 21st century.
We have new methods but the ostracism and shaming remains.
This is Jonah Lerher.
He was an up-and-coming author and journalist.
In this third published book “Imagine: the science of creativity” it was discovered that he fabricated quotes and eventually lead to the discovery of plagiarism in his other works.
His publisher recalled two of his books.
He lost his job at The New Yorker.
After a time he emerged to offer an apology speech at a conference in Miami.
As he did he shared the stage with a live twitter feed of reactions, in real time.
To give you an idea of how it went Buzzfeed recapped the scene with the headline: “The final humiliation of Jonah Lerher.”
The Athenians ostracized.
The colonists pilloried.
In our culture, you get cancelled.
Cancel culture can be a lot of things.
At it’s best it can be a movement of activism to boycott someone or something that has caused harm… at it’s worst it can be a sport of defamation and attempt at social control for the sake of notoriety, a platform, or just more likes on Twitter:
Rosane Barr
Collin Kapernick
Ellen Degenres faced a little bit of this for being homies with George W. Bush
J.K. Rowling
Dr. Suess
Mr. Potato Head
Character assassination of “Karens” everywhere
People that just cant help but sharing their scathing review of a restaurant on their facebook page.
Where is the line between accountability/justice/progress and just canceling people?
In specific, what is a Christian to do in the midst of this culture?
How do we engage or why should we not?
Where is the line that is faithful or helpful?
How do we come back from failure?
What happens when we mess up?
Cancel Culture: Differentiated from consequences in two ways:
When used as a form of social control and/or...
When accompanied as a sense of glee or entertainment
One liner: Christians shouldn’t see shame as a sport
Still, today, we have to talk accountability.
It might feel like an odd place to begin but it is appropriate....
We often want accountability for others but amnesty for ourselves
David’s Twitter Trending Travesty
So David is so lucky twitter did not exist.
That brother stepped in it.
This is a presidential scandal of the ages.
David sends his troops off to war and stays behind in a semi empty quarters.
One day in his boredom he spots a woman that catches his eye.
The wandering eye is not fatal, but the action upon it delivers a death blow.
He has Bathsheba brought over and takes advantage of this woman.
If it is consensual, he has abused his power and betrayed one of his best and most loyal fighters as well as harming Bathsheba’s place in a messed up patriarchy.
If it is worse than that then he has inflicted human harm of the worst kind.
This is the king, the man after God’s own heart.
The one chosen by God to lead God’s people.
Spared from enemies by God.
What is fascinating about this story that God has given us is that before Nathan is sent to confront him, we get a front row seat to see the familiar sin spiral that we can relate to.
David’s boredom, isolation, and lapse in discipline sets the scene
Let me project into the story for just a minute, for a teaching opportunity.
I would imagine being King is stressful.
I would imagine being at war and being a king is very stressful.
The combination of Stress and isolation in your life is a feeding ground for evil.
Then he begins to cover.
Bathsheba’s husband is away at war and when he can not trick him into thinking the child in womb is his, he arranges for his death.
God intervenes
Not Cancellation—> Confrontation
God sends the prophet Nathan to confront David.
Nathan uses a parable that tells of betrayal and theft from the powerful.
David burns with anger against the oppressor in the story, ignorant to the fact that it describes him.
He invokes OT law and swears towards this hypothetical man’s death.
David’s own Torah-violating behavior had not robbed him of his commitment to impose the requirements of the Torah on others!
Bergen, R. D. (1996).
1, 2 Samuel (Vol. 7, p. 370).
Nashville: Broadman & Holman Publishers.
Sometimes we become nastier with religion and morality and ethics about the very thing that binds us.
Accepting accountability is about allowing Jesus to have his rightful place to rule and reign in your heart.
And in this stage God reveals those places that you may have not yet yielded unto him.
When Nathan confirms that David is in fact this very person, David has a choice....
Will he accept accountability?
Will he continue running from his faults and the God he can never outrun?
Houston Zoo in the first grade
David makes the decision to own it.
Confession, though painful, is the first step of healing.
Now...
What would have happened if this got posted to social media?
What would have happened if TMZ was there?
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9