Sermon Tone Analysis

Overall tone of the sermon

This automated analysis scores the text on the likely presence of emotional, language, and social tones. There are no right or wrong scores; this is just an indication of tones readers or listeners may pick up from the text.
A score of 0.5 or higher indicates the tone is likely present.
Emotion Tone
Anger
0.14UNLIKELY
Disgust
0.1UNLIKELY
Fear
0.66LIKELY
Joy
0.62LIKELY
Sadness
0.2UNLIKELY
Language Tone
Analytical
0.67LIKELY
Confident
0UNLIKELY
Tentative
0.41UNLIKELY
Social Tone
Openness
0.86LIKELY
Conscientiousness
0.67LIKELY
Extraversion
0.35UNLIKELY
Agreeableness
0.56LIKELY
Emotional Range
0.64LIKELY

Tone of specific sentences

Tones
Emotion
Anger
Disgust
Fear
Joy
Sadness
Language
Analytical
Confident
Tentative
Social Tendencies
Openness
Conscientiousness
Extraversion
Agreeableness
Emotional Range
Anger
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9
Introduction
Without thinking about it, often our reasoning is this: “I—by my stupidity—got into this mess; therefore I—by my stupidity—will get out of it.”1205
The story is told of a carpenter who was nailing shingles on the roof of a house.
He lost his footing and started to slide off.
As he was sliding he began praying, “Lord, oh, Lord, help me!”
Still he kept sliding.
Again the man prayed, “Lord, oh, Lord, help me!”
He kept sliding until he got to the edge and a nail sticking up caught hold of his pants.
After he came to a stop he said, “Never mind, Lord.
The nail’s got hold of me now.”1206
Michael P. Green, 1500 Illustrations for Biblical Preaching (Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Books, 2000), 326–327.
The Complete Book of Zingers: Over 5,000 Perfect One-Liners (Selfishness)
Americans used to say, “Give me liberty.”
Today they just say, “Give me.”
We might be more eager to accept advice if it didn’t continually interfere with our plans.
People want things to come easy to them today.
The world today is very much about the consumer.
We live in a world that wants to go from nothing to something overnight.
We live in a world that self has become their God.
With this in mind, Paul in 1 Corinthians writes to correct faulty thinking that was creeping into the church.
It was a thinking that at its roots were founded on self and how one’s own reasoning and logic impacted how they viewed the gospel.
Self-reliance and self-gratification or self-congratulation are common threads through the text we looked at a couple weeks ago and what we are looking at this morning.
A few weeks ago we looked at the foolishness of the cross to the unbelieving.
We looked at how it does not make sense to the depraved human mind that a God would send His only son to die for a world of millions of people that live each day in opposition to who he is and what he desires.
Because of how God created mankind, every person looks for fulfillment, they want peace but because of sin what and how people do to obtain that becomes self-centered and unfulfilling.
Depending the depth of how much they have allowed sin to control their lives in spite of God’s common grace determines the level to which they dive to fill the void in their life that only God can fill.
It is from this combined with not understanding and seeing the cross as utter foolishness that drives the unsaved world to hate God as much as they do.
How God works and who He claims to be does not match up with the god people want or have constructed.
They return God’s love and sacrifice with ridicule and hatred.
Truly, what Paul is pointing out in verses 18-25 is God chose to use a way of salvation that goes against all human reasoning to magnify and glorify himself.
He chose the cross because it eliminates all human elements to achieving salvation.
It is completely divine and supernatural.
It makes man’s achieving salvation impossible and magnifies God’s miraculous power to save the sinner from eternal separation from God forever in hell.
Paul does not stop there in explaining away the human expectations about God.
As one commentator states it, “he turns from the content of the gospel to the existence of the Corinthians themselves as believers.”
He follows this by explaining the foolishness of the messenger or the proclaimer of the gospel.
Paul in our text this morning lays out how who God has chosen to save and the proclamation of the gospel destroys the fascinating approach people take with what they accept and see as what salvation is and large than that who God is.
Our big idea this morning deals with understanding that our wisdom, our eloquence, and our very standing in life has no impact on what God has, is, and will do in saving people from sin.
You say so what is the principle for us to think through as we look at this text--
Main Truth: We must let God strip away our self-reliance in living and proclaiming the Gospel.
Our text this morning gives to us two important truths that are necessary for us to receive and apply to our lives in order that we may not live self-reliant, self-indulgent, and self-congratulatory lives.
The first truth comes from 1 Corinthians 1:26-31
1 Corinthians 1:26–31 (NASB95)
26 For consider your calling, brethren, that there were not many wise according to the flesh, not many mighty, not many noble; 27 but God has chosen the foolish things of the world to shame the wise, and God has chosen the weak things of the world to shame the things which are strong, 28 and the base things of the world and the despised God has chosen, the things that are not, so that He may nullify the things that are, 29 so that no man may boast before God.
30 But by His doing you are in Christ Jesus, who became to us wisdom from God, and righteousness and sanctification, and redemption, 31 so that, just as it is written, “Let him who boasts, boast in the Lord.”
God chose the insignificant person to save.
The second truth this morning is God chose the unfascinating method to proclaim the gospel.
We will see this from 1 Corinthians 2:1-5
1 Corinthians 2:1–5 (NASB95)
1 And when I came to you, brethren, I did not come with superiority of speech or of wisdom, proclaiming to you the testimony of God. 2 For I determined to know nothing among you except Jesus Christ, and Him crucified.
3 I was with you in weakness and in fear and in much trembling, 4 and my message and my preaching were not in persuasive words of wisdom, but in demonstration of the Spirit and of power, 5 so that your faith would not rest on the wisdom of men, but on the power of God.
Transition: Let’s look at the first truth on why self-reliance is wrong as a christian—God chose the insignificant person to save.
I. God chose the insignificant to save (26-31).
The insignificance we are discussing is not a insignificance to God but what man sees as insignificant or as our text points out, the wise, mighty, and noble.
With God choosing the lowly things of this world, Paul completes the reversal of the triad he introduced in v. 26: (1) God chose the foolish over the wise; (2) the weak over the influential; and now (3) the lowly over those of noble birth.
God chose the foolish things to shame the wise.
- Your salvation is not dependent on how well you can make ethical and moral decisions.
God chose the weak things to shame the strong.
- Your salvation is not dependent on how influential you are.
God chose the base and despised to shame the noble.
- Your salvation is not dependent on how well the status of life you were born into.
In Corinth and during that time as well as other times throughout history, it was the noble born that received all the immediate riches and the better life while the lowly born were treated with disdain.
Paul is speaking that God chose to save mostly society’s insignificant.
The First Letter to the Corinthians (2.
Reminder of God’s Unexpected Choice of the Lowly in Corinth: Worldly Wisdom in the Light of Divine Election, 1:26–31)
The point is that not many is indefinite and does not necessarily mean “not any.”
In fact, evidence points to the presence of some Christians in Corinth with means or influence.
These include (1) officeholders—Crispus (1:14; cf.
Acts 18:8) and Erastus (Rom.
16:23); (2) heads of significant households—Crispus, Stephanas (1:16; 16:15), and Chloe (1:11); (3) those capable of “service” to Paul or others which presupposed a measure of wealth—Gaius (1:14; cf.
Rom.
16:23) and Titius Justus (Acts 18:17); and (4) those who traveled for business purposes or as merchants—Aquila and Priscilla (16:19; cf.
Rom.
16:3; Acts 18:2, 26), Phoebe (Rom.
16:1–2), Erastus, Stephanas, and possibly Chloe’s people (1:11).71
Ironically, honor was the very thing the Corinthians wanted to leach from their powerful and wise leaders.
Yet God acts to shame those whom the world regards as impressive.
But it is not just a matter of losing face or reputation, as serious as this may have been in Greco-Roman society.
Rather, the “shaming” must be understood in the sense of being condemned by God in judgment.
The Prophets and Psalms regularly attest to God’s determination to vindicate the righteous and bring the unrighteous to a shameful end (Isa.
41:11; Jer.
2:26; Pss.
6:10; 31:17; 35:4, 26–27; 40:15).
The two verses together leave the unmistakable impression of the deliberate, sovereign action of God in assembling, or “calling,” his people in Corinth contrary to all expectations.
God’s choice of the humble nation Israel was likewise surprising and unanticipated: “The LORD your God chose you to be a people for his treasured possession, out of all the peoples who are on the face of the earth.
It was not because you were more numerous than any other people” (Deut.
7:7).
Paul’s point is not that none of them amounted to anything, but that, as v. 27 indicates, they are “weak” and “foolish” as far as the world counts power and wisdom.
The Corinthian Christians are themselves proof that God’s categories of wisdom and power are not the world’s.
Why did God do all of this?
SO THAT no person can claim in anyway genuine credit for salvation from sin.
Paul uses the four terms to describe salvation, to describe the gospel.
He does so by referring these to the person of Jesus Christ and his work on the cross.
The work of all of it is done by God the Father through his Son Jesus Christ.
The four terms are: wisdom, righteousness, sanctification, and redemption.
The First Epistle to the Corinthians (B.
God’s Folly—The Corinthian Believers (1:26–31))
These are not three different steps in the saving process; they are rather three different metaphors for the same event (our salvation that was effected in Christ), each taken from a different sphere and each emphasizing a different aspect of the one reality
Christ exchanges the righteousness of God.
“Righteousness,” therefore, is not so much an ethical term here as it is forensic, and highlights the believer’s undeserved stance of right standing before God, despite his/her guilt from having broken his law.
Paul here is talking about the believer’s standing before God.
Our standing before God is not accomplished by a group of wise academics or some man that may have a dream supposedly revealed to him from God.
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9